Skip to main content
All Posts By

Felicio Law Firm

Family Court Fees Rise 1 July 2026 - Person reviewing court filing fee documents and a fee schedule at a desk

Family Court Fees Have Gone Up Again From 1 July 2026 — Here’s What It Costs Now

By Family Law

If you’re thinking about filing for divorce, or you’re already in the middle of a parenting or property matter, the price of going to court has changed. From 1 July 2026, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia lifted its filing and hearing fees again, as it does most years. The increases apply across the board — divorce applications, parenting and property applications, appeals, and hearing days. Here’s what the new figures are, why they change, and what it means if separation is on your mind this year.

Why Court Fees Go Up Every Year

Filing fees in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia are not set by the Court itself. They are prescribed by the Family Law (Fees) Regulations 2022 (Cth), a piece of Commonwealth legislation that is adjusted annually — almost always from 1 July — to keep pace with the cost of running the federal courts system. The increase is a mechanical exercise: indexation, not a policy decision by judges or registrars. That’s a useful thing to understand if you’re frustrated by the cost, because it means the fee schedule will keep moving each year regardless of who is on the bench or what reforms are happening elsewhere in family law.

For separating couples, the practical effect is straightforward. Filing a divorce application, starting proceedings about children or property, or asking the Court to list a matter for hearing now costs more than it did twelve months ago — and it will almost certainly cost more again next July.

The New Fees at a Glance

The following figures are current from 1 July 2026, drawn from the Court’s published family law fee schedule.

Application or Event Current Fee (from 1 July 2026)
Application for divorce $1,170
Application for divorce — reduced fee $390
Application for decree of nullity $1,660
Application for decree of nullity — reduced fee $550
Application for consent orders $215
Initiating Application — Parenting *or* Financial (final orders only) $455
Initiating Application — Parenting *or* Financial (final and interim) $610
Initiating Application — Parenting *and* Financial (final orders only) $740
Initiating Application — Parenting *and* Financial (final and interim) $895
Response to Initiating Application $455
Notice of appeal $1,775
Interim order application / application in a case $155
Conciliation conference $510

A few things are worth noticing in that table. An application that seeks both parenting and financial orders is more expensive than an application confined to one or the other — $740 versus $455 for final orders alone. And if you need the Court to deal with something urgently while your main application is on foot, the $155 interim order fee is added on top, not absorbed into the base fee. Someone filing an Initiating Application covering both parenting and financial matters, with an interim order sought as well, is looking at $895 in Court fees before their lawyer’s professional fees are even considered.

Reduced Fees and Fee Exemptions

The Court fee for a divorce application is not something you can be exempted from altogether — but it can be reduced. If you hold a relevant Government concession card (such as a Health Care Card, Pensioner Concession Card, or Commonwealth Seniors Health Card), or you are receiving Legal Aid, or you can otherwise demonstrate genuine financial hardship, you may qualify for the reduced divorce fee of $390 rather than the full $1,170. The same reduced-fee pathway applies to nullity applications. If you are filing jointly with your former spouse, both of you need to separately qualify for the reduction — one partner’s eligibility does not automatically extend to the other.

For most other applications — parenting, property, or financial matters — a full fee exemption (rather than just a reduction) may be available on the same grounds of concession card holding, Legal Aid grants, or financial hardship. This is a genuinely useful safeguard for people who are already under financial strain because of separation, and it is worth raising with your lawyer early, before you file, rather than after the fee has been paid.

What This Means If You’re Separating

None of this changes the underlying law of divorce, parenting arrangements, or property settlement. What it changes is the cost of accessing the Court, and that has some practical flow-on effects worth thinking through.

  • Budget for the application, not just the lawyer. Court filing fees are a disbursement — a cost separate from your solicitor’s professional fees — and they need to be paid regardless of how simple or amicable your matter is.
  • Consider consent orders early if you and your former partner agree. At $215, an application for consent orders is markedly cheaper than contested Initiating Applications, and it locks in a property or parenting agreement with the same legal force as a court order.
  • Ask about the reduced or exempt fee pathways before you file, not after — the eligibility criteria are assessed at the time of filing, and retrospective refunds are not guaranteed.
  • Factor hearing fees into a contested matter. If your case does go to a defended hearing, each hearing day beyond the first attracts its own fee, on top of the filing fee already paid — a cost that can add up in a lengthy or complex dispute.
  • Revisit your timeline if cost is a genuine barrier. There is no requirement to rush a divorce application; couples must in any event be separated for twelve months before applying, which gives most people time to plan around the fee.

A Word on Timing and Twelve Months’ Separation

It’s worth remembering that an application for divorce can only be filed once a couple has been separated for at least twelve months, under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The fee increase doesn’t change that requirement, but it is a reminder that the twelve-month period is also a useful window to plan practically — including budgeting for the filing fee, gathering documents, and, where property or parenting matters are also in play, starting those conversations well before the divorce application itself becomes relevant.

The Bottom Line

Court fees are a small but real part of the cost of separation, and they rise every year as a matter of course. The July 2026 increase doesn’t change your rights or the process — it simply means the numbers attached to that process are higher than they were last year. Knowing the current figures, and knowing whether you might qualify for a reduced or exempt fee, means there are no surprises when it’s time to file.

If you’re separating, or you’re already navigating a parenting or property matter and want to understand what the current Court fees mean for your situation, don’t hesitate to get in touch with one of our friendly Family Lawyers Central Coast. We can also help you understand how these fees interact with broader questions around legal separation and divorce, and how costs are typically dealt with in family law matters. Contact us to arrange a time to talk through your options.

The Coming Ban on Non-Compete Clauses: What NSW Small Businesses Need to Know

The Coming Ban on Non-Compete Clauses: What NSW Small Businesses Need to Know

By Business Law

If you run a small business and your employment contracts include a clause stopping staff from joining a competitor after they leave, a significant change is on its way. The Federal Government has announced a ban on non-compete clauses for most workers, due to take effect from 2027. For business owners on the Central Coast who rely on these clauses to protect their client base and know-how, now is the time to understand what is changing and what will still be allowed.

What is a non-compete clause?

A non-compete clause is a term in an employment contract that stops a departing employee from working for a competitor, or starting a competing business, for a set period and within a set area after they leave. It is one type of restraint of trade — a broad category of contractual restrictions designed to protect a business after the working relationship ends.

Restraints typically come in three forms:

  • Non-compete — preventing the employee from working for a rival or setting up in competition.
  • Non-solicitation of clients — preventing them from approaching the business’s customers.
  • Non-solicitation of staff — preventing them from poaching former colleagues.

These clauses exist because a business has legitimate things worth protecting: confidential information, trade connections, and the goodwill built up with clients. The law has long allowed reasonable restraints for that purpose. What is changing is how far that will be permitted to go.

What the Government has announced

As part of the 2025–26 Federal Budget, the Government announced it will introduce a statutory ban on non-compete clauses for workers earning below the high-income threshold. The reform is intended to operate from 2027, prospectively, giving businesses and workers time to adjust.

The reasoning behind the change is about job mobility and wages. The Government’s position is that millions of Australian workers — including people in lower-paid roles such as hospitality, childcare and hairdressing — are bound by non-compete clauses that make it harder for them to move to a better-paid job. By removing those restraints for most workers, the policy aims to lift wages and encourage competition.

Alongside the non-compete ban, the Government has signalled it will also act against:

  • “No-poach” agreements — arrangements between businesses not to hire each other’s staff.
  • Wage-fixing arrangements — agreements between businesses to cap pay or conditions, made without the affected workers’ knowledge.

These broader changes are proposed to be delivered through amendments to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), which currently exempts most employment arrangements from competition law, and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

The income threshold — and a moving figure

The ban is tied to the high-income threshold under the Fair Work Act. This is an important detail, because the threshold is indexed and changes on 1 July each year.

When the reform was announced in March 2025, the threshold sat at $175,000. From 1 July 2025 it rose to $183,100 for the 2025–26 financial year. By the time the ban commences in 2027, the figure will almost certainly be higher again. The practical point for a small business is that the ban is aimed at the bulk of ordinary workers, not senior executives. Employees earning above the threshold of the day are expected to fall outside it.

This is one reason it is worth checking the current figure rather than relying on a number you saw in a headline. The Fair Work Ombudsman publishes the current threshold, and the Treasury maintains a page on the non-compete reforms as they develop.

The exception that matters most: selling a business

Here is the point that every business owner should hold onto. The proposed ban is not intended to extend to non-compete restraints connected with the sale of a business.

This distinction is significant. When you buy a business, a large part of what you are paying for is its goodwill — the loyal customers, the reputation, the trade connections. A restraint preventing the seller from immediately opening a competing operation across the road is fundamental to protecting that value. Removing it would make businesses far harder to sell. The reform, as announced, leaves these sale-of-business restraints alone.

So if you are buying or selling a business, the restraint clauses in that contract are a different question from the employment-contract clauses the ban targets. We cover the broader process in our guide to buying an existing business in NSW, and the restraint terms are one of the things worth getting right at that stage.

Where this leaves NSW restraint law today

It helps to understand the current position, because it does not change overnight. NSW is unusual in Australia in having its own statute on the subject — the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW). Under the general law, a restraint of trade is presumed void as against public policy unless it is reasonable, and a court will only enforce it so far as it protects a legitimate business interest and goes no further than necessary. The NSW Act gives courts a degree of flexibility to read down an overly broad restraint rather than strike it out entirely.

In other words, even now, a non-compete is not automatically enforceable just because it is written into a contract. It must be reasonable in its duration, its geographic reach, and the activity it restricts. A clause that bars a former employee from the entire industry, nationwide, for five years is unlikely to survive a challenge.

The coming reform sits on top of this. From 2027, for workers below the threshold, the question of reasonableness will not even arise for non-compete clauses — they are simply to be banned. For higher earners and for sale-of-business restraints, the existing principles continue to apply.

Practical first steps for business owners

The reform is still working through consultation and is not yet law, but preparation now will save trouble later. Sensible steps include:

  • Audit your contracts. Identify which roles currently carry non-compete clauses, especially employees likely to sit below the threshold.
  • Rethink how you protect your business. Confidentiality clauses and protection of genuine trade secrets are not the target of the ban. These remain valuable tools.
  • Strengthen retention. If you cannot lock staff in by contract, culture, development and fair pay become the real levers for keeping good people.
  • Treat business-sale restraints separately. If you are buying or selling, get the restraint terms drafted carefully — they are outside the ban and remain enforceable if reasonable.

If you are concerned about how staff movement affects your business, it is also worth understanding the wider employment law framework, including adverse action by an employer, which can intersect with how and why employees are managed and moved on.

The Bottom Line

A ban on non-compete clauses for most workers is coming from 2027, and it will reshape how small businesses protect themselves when staff leave. The clauses you can no longer rely on are the ones aimed at ordinary employees below the income threshold. The protections that survive — confidentiality, reasonable client non-solicitation in some cases, and restraints tied to the sale of a business — remain important. The businesses that fare best will be the ones that review their contracts early and adapt rather than wait.

If you have questions about your employment contracts, restraint clauses, or a business sale or purchase, don’t hesitate to get in touch with one of our business lawyers on the Central Coast. We can help you prepare for the change well before it takes effect.

What You Must Tell a Buyer When Selling Your Home in NSW

What You Must Tell a Buyer When Selling Your Home in NSW

By Conveyancing

Selling a property feels like a race to settlement — agent appointed, photos taken, buyers through the door. But before any of that, the law in New South Wales places a clear set of obligations on you as the seller. Get the disclosure right and the sale runs smoothly. Get it wrong, and a buyer may have the right to walk away, sometimes well after contracts are exchanged. Here is what NSW law actually requires you to disclose, and why it matters more than many sellers realise.

The starting point: NSW is not a “buyer beware” state

There is an old legal principle called caveat emptor — let the buyer beware. It suggests the risk of a bad purchase sits entirely with the buyer. In NSW, that principle has been substantially cut back when it comes to selling land. Sellers cannot simply stay silent and leave a purchaser to discover problems on their own.

The framework comes from the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) and the regulation made under it, the Conveyancing (Sale of Land) Regulation 2022 (NSW), which commenced on 1 September 2022. Together they require certain documents to be attached to the contract for sale before the property goes to market, and they imply certain promises — called warranties — into every contract whether the seller likes it or not.

This is different from the agent’s separate duty. Real estate agents in NSW have their own obligation not to conceal “material facts” they know or ought to know. The seller’s disclosure duty under the Conveyancing Act sits alongside that and is the focus here.

The prescribed documents you must attach

Section 52A of the Conveyancing Act allows regulations to prescribe documents that must be attached to a contract for the sale of residential land. Schedule 1 of the 2022 Regulation sets out that list. In practice, for a standard residential sale, the contract must include things such as:

  • A title search for the land, showing who owns it and what is registered against it.
  • A copy of the plan that created the lot, and any registered dealings, easements, covenants or restrictions noted on the title.
  • A current planning certificate (often called a section 10.7 certificate) issued by the local council, setting out zoning and planning controls.
  • A drainage or sewerage diagram showing the location of any sewer main affecting the property.

If the property is part of a strata scheme or community scheme, additional documents are required — including the relevant by-laws and instruments affecting the common property. If a swimming pool is present, compliance information is also relevant.

The reason for this is straightforward. A buyer is committing a large sum to a property, and these documents reveal the legal realities — who can run a pipe across the land, whether a neighbour has a right of way, what the council will and will not permit. Attaching them upfront means the buyer signs with eyes open.

What happens if a document is missing

This is where many sellers underestimate the stakes. If a prescribed document is not attached as required, the purchaser may have a right to rescind the contract — that is, to bring it to an end — within a set period after exchange. They do not need to prove they suffered any loss. The remedy exists because the document was missing, full stop.

There are limits and exceptions, and a seller can sometimes preserve the contract if the omission is minor or the buyer had the information anyway. But relying on those exceptions is a poor strategy. It is far cheaper to prepare the contract properly than to fight about whether a rescission right has been triggered.

The warranties you give without saying a word

Beyond the attached documents, the 2022 Regulation implies a set of warranties into the contract. In broad terms, the seller is treated as promising things such as: that the land is not subject to certain adverse matters not disclosed in the contract, that there are no undisclosed planning notices or orders affecting the property, and that the seller is not aware of certain undisclosed defects in title.

These warranties operate automatically. A seller who knows of an adverse affectation and stays quiet, hoping it slips through, is not just being commercially risky — they may be in breach of a warranty the law has written into their contract for them. That can hand the buyer a right to compensation or, in some cases, to end the contract.

Cooling off — a related protection for buyers

NSW also gives most residential buyers a cooling-off period, under section 66S of the Conveyancing Act. After contracts are exchanged, a private-treaty buyer generally has five business days in which they can rescind, forfeiting a small percentage of the purchase price (0.25%) if they do. There are exceptions — notably, cooling off does not apply to sales by auction.

This matters to sellers because it shapes the early days after exchange. A buyer who exchanges and then discovers a disclosure problem during the cooling-off window has an easy exit. Clean disclosure reduces the chance of a buyer using that window to escape a deal you thought was done.

How NSW compares to Queensland

If you have sold property across the border, the rules feel different. We have written separately about Queensland’s seller disclosure scheme, which changed significantly on 1 August 2025 when the Property Law Act 2023 (Qld) introduced a mandatory Form 2 seller disclosure statement and a bundle of prescribed certificates that must be given before a contract is signed.

The two states now sit closer together than they once did, but the mechanisms differ:

  NSW QLD (from 1 Aug 2025)
Core law Conveyancing Act 1919 + 2022 Regulation Property Law Act 2023 (Qld)
Method Prescribed documents attached to the contract Form 2 statement plus prescribed certificates
Timing Before the property is marketed Before the buyer signs
Buyer remedy Rescission for missing documents; warranty claims Termination for non-compliance, up to settlement

The practical lesson is the same in both states. Disclosure is no longer optional, and the cost of getting it wrong falls on the seller.

Practical first steps before you list

A little preparation removes most of the risk. If you are getting ready to sell in NSW, consider the following:

  • Engage a conveyancing lawyer early — before the agent’s board goes up, not after a buyer is found. The contract needs to be ready to go.
  • Order your certificates and searches so every prescribed document can be attached from day one.
  • Disclose what you know. If you are aware of a drainage issue, an unapproved structure or a dispute with a neighbour, tell your lawyer. Hiding it rarely ends well and can breach the implied warranties.
  • Check strata and pool compliance if they apply, as these carry their own document requirements.

For a fuller picture of how a sale moves from listing to settlement, our guide to the conveyancing process in NSW walks through each stage. The NSW Government also publishes general buying and selling property information for an overview of the process.

The Bottom Line

Selling a home in NSW is not a matter of handing the keys over and hoping for the best. The Conveyancing Act and the 2022 Regulation set out exactly what must be disclosed, attach real consequences to getting it wrong, and write certain promises into your contract automatically. A buyer armed with a rescission right can unwind a sale you thought was settled. The good news is that almost all of this risk disappears with proper preparation before the property is listed.

If you are thinking about selling, or you want your contract for sale prepared correctly from the outset, don’t hesitate to get in touch with one of our friendly conveyancing lawyers on the Central Coast. A short conversation now can save a great deal of stress later.

Child Custody in Australia: What Courts Decide in 2024

How Courts Determine “Child Custody” in Australia: A Guide for Separating Parents

By Family Law

When a relationship ends and children are involved, one question dominates: who will the children live with, and how will day-to-day care be shared? Many parents still describe this as “child custody” — but Australian family law moved away from that term nearly thirty years ago. Today, the law speaks of parenting arrangements, parental responsibility, and the time a child spends with each parent. The framework changed again on 6 May 2024, when significant amendments to Part VII of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) came into force. This article explains how the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia now decides these matters.

A Note on Terminology: Why “Custody” Is the Wrong Word

The word “custody” has not appeared in Australian family law since the Family Law Reform Act 1995 (Cth) replaced it. Parliament considered the language adversarial — implying ownership of children rather than responsibility for them.

The current language under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) is more careful. The Court makes parenting orders that deal with three separate questions:

  • Parental responsibility — the duty and authority to make decisions about a child’s long-term welfare.
  • Who the child lives with.
  • The time the child spends, and the communication the child has, with each parent and other significant people.

The shift matters in practice. A parent can have decision-making responsibility without the child living with them most of the time. Equally, a child can spend substantial time with both parents without the parents agreeing on schooling or medical choices. The Court treats these as distinct questions.

The Paramount Consideration: The Best Interests of the Child

Section 60CA of the Act sets the foundation: in deciding whether to make any parenting order, the best interests of the child are the paramount consideration. Not the wishes of either parent. Not the convenience of the household arrangements. The child’s welfare comes first, and everything else is weighed against it.

What “best interests” actually means is set out in section 60CC. Before May 2024, that section listed two “primary” considerations and thirteen “additional” considerations. The list was long, hierarchical, and — according to the Australian Law Reform Commission’s 2019 review — confusing for parents and lawyers alike.

The new section 60CC, in force since 6 May 2024, replaces all of that with a shorter, non-hierarchical list of six general factors that apply to every parenting decision the Court makes.

The Six Factors Under the New Section 60CC

The Court must consider each of the following when deciding what arrangements are in a child’s best interests:

  • What arrangements would promote the safety of the child and each person who cares for the child — including safety from family violence, abuse, neglect, or other harm.
  • The child’s views. Any views expressed by the child, with the weight given to them depending on the child’s age, maturity, and the circumstances in which the views were formed.
  • The child’s needs. The developmental, psychological, emotional, and cultural needs of the child.
  • Each parent’s capacity. The capacity of each person who has, or is proposed to have, parental responsibility to provide for those needs.
  • The benefit of relationships. The benefit to the child of being able to have a relationship with each parent and other significant people, where it is safe to do so.
  • Anything else relevant. Any other circumstance specific to the child.

A separate provision, section 60CC(2A), requires the Court — when assessing the safety factor — to take into account any history of family violence, abuse, or neglect, and any family violence orders that apply or have applied. Section 60CC(3) adds further considerations where the child is Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, including the right to enjoy their culture and the support available to do so.

The factors are not ranked. The Court weighs them according to the circumstances of each case. In one matter, safety concerns will dominate. In another, the child’s views or developmental needs may carry more weight.

Parental Responsibility: What Changed in 2024

For nearly twenty years, the Act contained a presumption of equal shared parental responsibility. If the Court made an order for equal shared parental responsibility, it then had to consider whether the child should spend equal time, or substantial and significant time, with each parent.

That presumption has been repealed. As of 6 May 2024, there is no longer a starting assumption that parents should share decision-making equally, and no automatic step that links decision-making to time arrangements.

Section 61D of the amended Act now allows the Court to make orders for joint decision-making or sole decision-making on major long-term issues — schooling, health care, religion, name, and significant changes to living arrangements — based purely on what is in the child’s best interests in each case. Where joint decision-making is ordered, section 61DAA requires the parents to consult one another and make a genuine effort to reach a joint decision.

It is worth saying clearly: the law has never required children to spend equal time with each parent. The repealed presumption only ever applied to decision-making, and any link to time was always conditional on the child’s best interests. The amendments simply remove confusion that had built up around how those provisions worked together.

Old Framework vs New Framework

The differences between the pre-2024 position and the current position are significant in practice.

Issue Before 6 May 2024 From 6 May 2024
Best interests factors Two primary + thirteen additional, hierarchical Six general factors, non-hierarchical
Parental responsibility Presumption of equal shared parental responsibility No presumption — assessed case by case
Equal time Court required to consider equal time if presumption applied Removed; time is decided purely on best interests
Decision-making language “Equal shared parental responsibility” “Joint decision-making” or “sole decision-making” on major long-term issues
Family violence One of multiple factors Embedded across the safety factor and a dedicated provision
Reconsidering final orders Common law rule in Rice v Asplund Codified in section 65DAAA

How the Process Actually Works

For most separated parents, court is the last step, not the first. The Act and the Court’s pre-action procedures expect parents to attempt to resolve parenting issues outside court before filing.

The typical pathway looks like this:

  • Family dispute resolution. Most parents must attend family dispute resolution (FDR) before filing a parenting application. A practitioner provides a section 60I certificate confirming the attempt was made. Limited exceptions apply — for instance, where there has been family violence or genuine urgency.
  • Negotiated agreement. If agreement is reached, parents can record arrangements in a parenting plan (signed and dated, but not legally enforceable as orders) or apply for consent orders, which the Court can make without a hearing.
  • Filing an application. If agreement cannot be reached, a parent files an Initiating Application supported by an affidavit addressing the section 60CC factors and a Notice of child abuse, family violence or risk.
  • Family report or expert evidence. A Court Child Expert may interview the family and prepare a report on the child’s needs and the proposed arrangements.
  • Final hearing. If the matter does not settle, the Court hears evidence and makes final orders applying the section 60CC framework.

Filing fees apply at most stages. As of 1 July 2025, an Initiating Application for final parenting orders (parenting only) is $435, with a further $150 for an interim order application. Fees are reviewed annually and current figures are published on the FCFCOA fees page. Concession card holders and applicants in financial hardship may be eligible for reduced or waived fees.

How the Courts Are Applying the New Law

The first published parenting decision under the amended Part VII was Shams & Alkaios (No 2) [2024] FedCFamC2F 620, decided on 20 May 2024. Judge Glass worked through each new section 60CC factor in turn in a relocation dispute between parents in Melbourne and Queensland. The case suggested that the substance of the analysis under the new section 60CC is closely related to the analysis under the old framework — what has changed is the structure and language, not the underlying questions a Court asks about a child’s welfare.

The new section 65DAAA, which codifies the long-standing rule in Rice v Asplund on when a final parenting order can be reopened, generated some early uncertainty. The Full Court resolved that uncertainty in Radecki & Radecki [2024] FedCFamC1A 246, confirming that the Court must still find a significant change in circumstances before reconsidering final orders made earlier.

The body of law is still building, and the Full Court will continue to refine how the simplified framework operates. For separating parents, the practical message is steady: the Court’s job is to identify the arrangements that best serve the particular child in front of it.

Practical First Steps for Separating Parents

If you are facing decisions about parenting arrangements, a few steps tend to make the path clearer:

  • Focus on the children, not the relationship. The Court’s framework is child-centred. Submissions, affidavits, and negotiations that emphasise the child’s needs over grievances tend to land better.
  • Document the existing care arrangements. Schools, medical appointments, daily routines — a clear factual picture of who has been doing what helps any decision-maker, whether a mediator or a judge.
  • Keep safety paramount. If family violence or risk to the child is a concern, raise it early and clearly. Section 60CC now places safety first among the factors the Court must weigh.
  • Try mediation before litigation. Family dispute resolution is required for most cases and often produces better-tailored outcomes than a contested hearing.
  • Get tailored legal advice early. General information is a starting point; the right strategy depends on the specific circumstances of your family.

The Bottom Line

The law that governs parenting arrangements in Australia changed materially on 6 May 2024. The terminology of “custody” is gone. The presumption of equal shared parental responsibility is gone. In their place sits a streamlined, child-focused framework: six factors under section 60CC, careful attention to safety, and orders shaped to the child rather than to either parent’s preferred outcome.

For parents on the Central Coast and across NSW, the message is reassuring in one respect — the Court’s central question has not changed. It is, and remains, what is best for this child.

If you have questions about parenting arrangements, decision-making responsibility, or how the new framework applies to your situation, don’t hesitate to get in touch with one of our friendly Family Lawyers Central Coast. We can guide you through every stage — from negotiation and parenting plans, to consent orders or contested proceedings, including related matters such as property settlements where children are involved. Contact our team today.

Data Privacy Law NSW: Small Business Guide

How the New Data Privacy Law Impacts Small Businesses in NSW

By Business Law

For more than two decades, most small businesses in Australia operated outside the reach of federal privacy law. If your annual turnover was under $3 million, the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and its 13 Australian Privacy Principles simply did not apply to you. That settled position is now under sustained pressure. The Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 (Cth) — which received Royal Assent on 10 December 2024 — has rewritten significant parts of the privacy regime, and a second tranche of reforms is expected to remove the small business exemption altogether. This article explains what has already changed for NSW small businesses, what is coming, and what sensible owners are doing now.

The Privacy Act in Brief

The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) regulates how organisations handle personal information — anything from names and email addresses to photographs, CCTV footage, and customer purchase histories. The core obligations sit in the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), which cover collection, storage, use, disclosure, security, access, and correction of personal information.

Under section 6D of the Act, a “small business operator” with an annual turnover of $3 million or less is excluded from the definition of “organisation” and so falls outside the APP regime. According to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), this exemption captures the vast majority of Australian businesses — well over 2 million enterprises.

The exemption was introduced in 2000 to spare smaller operators from compliance costs. It has not been updated since, and the digital landscape has changed beyond recognition.

What Changed in December 2024

The first tranche of privacy reform has already commenced. The amendments most relevant to NSW small businesses are:

  • Higher penalties and tougher enforcement. Civil penalties for serious or repeated interferences with privacy can reach $50 million, three times the benefit obtained from the conduct, or 30 per cent of adjusted turnover — whichever is highest. The OAIC can also issue infringement notices of up to $66,000 per contravention for lower-level failings such as not having a compliant privacy policy.
  • Stronger security obligations. APP 11 — which requires “reasonable steps” to secure personal information — has been clarified to expressly include “technical and organisational measures.” That means encryption, access controls, secure backups, staff training, written procedures, and regular review.
  • A statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. Commenced on 10 June 2025. For the first time, individuals can sue another party directly for a serious invasion of their privacy.
  • New criminal offences for “doxxing.” Targeted release of personal data online or by phone to menace or harass a person now carries serious criminal penalties.
  • Anti-money laundering reforms. From 1 July 2026, around 100,000 small businesses in sectors such as conveyancing, real estate, accounting, and professional services will be brought into the Privacy Act through tranche 2 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) reforms — regardless of turnover.
  • Automated decision-making transparency. Businesses covered by the Act that use computer programs (including AI) to make decisions significantly affecting individuals will need to disclose this in their privacy policies. This obligation commences 10 December 2026.

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner is also developing a Children’s Online Privacy Code, which will impose specific obligations on services accessible by children once registered.

The Statutory Tort: Why It Matters Even If You Are “Exempt”

The most significant practical change for many small business owners is the new statutory tort. It does not depend on the small business exemption. Any business or individual can be sued.

A plaintiff must establish that:

  • The defendant invaded their privacy by intruding upon their seclusion or by misusing information about them;
  • The plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy;
  • The invasion was serious;
  • The invasion was intentional or reckless; and
  • The public interest in the plaintiff’s privacy outweighs any countervailing public interest such as freedom of expression.

For a small NSW business, the implications are concrete. Mishandling customer data after a cyber incident, sharing a former employee’s medical information without consent, or installing covert surveillance can all give rise to a cause of action — quite apart from any complaint to the OAIC. Damages for non-economic loss are capped at the same level as defamation damages, which means awards can be substantial.

Is the Small Business Exemption Going Away?

In short — yes, but not yet. As of May 2026, the section 6D exemption remains in force. The Federal Government has agreed in principle to remove it, and the Attorney-General has confirmed that a second tranche of reforms is being progressed. No Bill has been introduced and no commencement date has been set.

Even with the exemption still on the books, the practical position is shifting. Several categories of small business have always been required to comply with the Privacy Act regardless of turnover, including:

  • Health service providers (including allied health, gyms, and childcare operators that hold health information);
  • Businesses that trade in personal information (buying or selling lists, leads, or profiles);
  • Credit reporting bodies and credit providers;
  • Recipients of Tax File Numbers; and
  • Contractors providing services under a Commonwealth contract.

If your NSW business falls into any of these categories, you are already covered by the APPs, no matter your size.

What This Looks Like in Practice for a NSW Business

The reforms reach into ordinary day-to-day operations. A snapshot of where they bite:

Activity What the law now expects
Holding customer records Reasonable technical and organisational security measures, including encryption and access controls (APP 11)
Sending marketing emails Clear consent, easy unsubscribe, and a current privacy policy if covered by the Act
Workplace surveillance Compliance with the Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 (NSW) and increasing scrutiny under the new statutory tort
Using AI tools or chatbots Transparency in privacy policy from 10 December 2026 if covered by the Act
Suffering a data breach If covered, assess within 30 days and notify the OAIC and affected individuals where serious harm is likely
Children using your service Future obligations under the Children’s Online Privacy Code once registered

 

The Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 (NSW) sits alongside the federal regime and continues to govern how NSW employers monitor employee email, internet use, and movement. It is unaffected by the Privacy Act amendments and remains an independent compliance obligation for any business with employees in NSW.

The Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme

For businesses already covered by the Privacy Act, the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme (Part IIIC of the Act) requires you to act when something goes wrong. The scheme bites where:

  • There is unauthorised access to, unauthorised disclosure of, or loss of personal information;
  • Serious harm to one or more individuals is likely; and
  • Remedial action has not removed that risk.

If a suspected breach occurs, you have a maximum of 30 calendar days under section 26WH to assess whether it is an “eligible data breach”. If it is, you must notify both the OAIC and affected individuals as soon as practicable. The OAIC publishes a half-yearly statistical report and is increasingly willing to use its enforcement powers when breaches are mishandled.

A small NSW business that is currently exempt from the Privacy Act has no formal NDB obligation — but if the second-tranche reforms remove the exemption, the NDB scheme will apply automatically. Building the capability to detect, contain, and document a breach is sensible regardless.

Practical First Steps for NSW Small Businesses

Whether you are currently covered by the Act, due to be drawn in by the AML reforms in July 2026, or simply preparing for the eventual removal of the small business exemption, the same building blocks apply:

  • Map your personal information. What do you collect, why, where is it stored, who has access, and how long do you keep it? You cannot protect what you have not inventoried.
  • Write or update a privacy policy. Plain English, on your website, addressing collection, use, disclosure, storage, access, and complaints. This is already a legal requirement if you are covered, and a strong signal to customers either way.
  • Tighten your security. Multi-factor authentication, encrypted storage, regular software patching, restricted access, and a disciplined approach to portable devices and removable media.
  • Train your people. Most breaches involve human error. A short annual session on phishing, password hygiene, and incident reporting goes a long way.
  • Have a data breach response plan. Even if you are not yet obliged to notify, you should know who is responsible for assessing an incident, who to call, and what records to keep.
  • Review your contracts. Service agreements with cloud providers, IT contractors, and marketing platforms should set out data handling responsibilities clearly. You remain accountable for your customers’ information even when a third party holds it.

The Bottom Line

The privacy reforms now in force represent the most significant change to Australian privacy law since the Act was introduced in 1988. The small business exemption is still in place — for now — but the direction of travel is unmistakable. Penalties have risen sharply, individuals can sue directly through the new statutory tort, and certain sectors are being drawn into the Act regardless of turnover. The businesses on the Central Coast and across NSW that begin preparing now will face a smoother transition, fewer cyber risks, and a stronger basis for the trust customers expect.

If you have questions about how the Privacy Act reforms affect your business, the AML/CTF changes coming in July 2026, or how to prepare a compliant privacy framework, don’t hesitate to get in touch with one of our friendly Business Lawyers Central Coast. We can help you assess your obligations, draft policies, and put practical compliance steps in place — and if employment or contractual issues sit alongside your privacy concerns, we can address those at the same time. Contact our team today.

Discover the key differences between legal separation and divorce in Australia.

Key Differences Between Legal Separation and Divorce in Australia

By Family Law

When a marriage hits a wall, two words tend to surface quickly — separation and divorce. Most people use them as though they mean the same thing. They do not. The key differences between legal separation and divorce in Australia go well beyond semantics. They affect your marital status, your financial rights, your Will, and the legal deadlines that govern what happens next — so getting them straight from the start is not just useful but essential.

What is Separation?

Separation occurs the moment one or both partners decide the relationship is over and begin living their lives accordingly. It does not require a court order. It does not require any paperwork. No one needs to file anything, sign anything, or notify a government agency.

What it does require is intent — a genuine decision by at least one person that the marriage or de facto relationship has ended.

Condition Required for Separation?
Court order or legal document No
Agreement from both partners No — one person’s decision is enough
Living in separate homes No — “separated under one roof” is recognised
Formal notification to any government body No
Genuine intention to end the relationship Yes — this is the only requirement
A clear, identifiable date Yes — critical for legal timelines

From that date forward, the clock starts ticking on some of the most consequential legal timelines you will encounter. The date of separation affects when you can apply for divorce, how long you have to resolve property matters, and how courts view your financial situation during any subsequent proceedings.

This is why that date deserves careful attention. Write it down. Record it. If the date is ever disputed — and sometimes it is — the difference of even a few weeks can have real legal consequences.

Can You Be Separated and Still Live Together?

Yes. This is something that catches many people off guard. Under Australian family law, it is entirely possible to be “separated under one roof.” If financial hardship, shared parenting responsibilities, or other practical constraints mean both people are still living in the same house, the law allows for a separation to have begun nonetheless.

The court will, however, want to see evidence that the relationship had genuinely ended. The following will be relevant:

  • Changes in sleeping arrangements;
  • separate finances;
  • the absence of shared social activities; and
  • evidence that friends and family were informed of the split.

It is wise to keep records of these changes and to seek legal advice early in this situation.

What is Divorce in Australia?

Divorce is the court order that formally ends a marriage. Once granted, both parties are free to remarry.

Australia uses a no-fault system under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (the “Act”). That is, the court does not consider who ended the relationship or why. It asks only one question: has the marriage broken down irretrievably?

Key Requirements for Divorce in Australia

To apply for divorce in Australia, you must satisfy the following:

  • Twelve months of separation: You and your spouse must have been separated for at least 12 months and one day before you can file. The separation period can include time spent “separated under one roof,” provided you can demonstrate to the court that the relationship had in fact ended.
  • A reasonable likelihood of reconciliation must not exist. The court needs to be satisfied that the marriage has broken down permanently.

However, take note that if you have children under 18, a divorce order will not take effect until the court has declared it is satisfied that proper arrangements have been made for their care, welfare, and development. You must address this in your application.

What’s the Difference Between Legal Separation and Divorce?

Category Separation Divorce
Definition The decision by one or both partners to end the relationship The formal legal dissolution of a marriage by court order
Legal process required? No — no court order or paperwork needed Yes — application filed with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Ends the marriage legally? No — you remain legally married Yes — the marriage is formally dissolved
Applies to de facto couples? Yes No — divorce is only available to married couples
Waiting period None — takes effect immediately Must be separated for at least 12 months and one day before filing
Court involvement None required Required — though attendance is not usually necessary
Costs

 

None

(unless disputes require legal proceedings)

Application fee (as of March 2026):

●      $1,125

●      $375 (reduced fee for concession card holders)

Can you remarry? No Yes — once the divorce order is final
Property settlement deadline Starts the clock — proceedings can begin immediately 12 months from the date the divorce order becomes final
De facto property deadline 2 years from date of separation Does not apply — de facto couples do not divorce
Effect on your Will No automatic change Revokes gifts to former spouse and their appointment as executor
Superannuation nominations No automatic change — update manually No automatic change — update manually

Understanding these differences is not just a legal exercise. The decisions you make — and the deadlines you either meet or miss — in the months after separation can shape your financial and family life for years to come. If any of these distinctions raise questions about your own situation, that is a conversation worth having with a family lawyer sooner rather than later.

The Numbers: How Common Is Divorce in Australia?

Relationship breakdown is far from rare. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2025), there were 47,216 divorces granted in Australia in 2024. This was 3.0% less than in 2023, and is the lowest rate in 50 years.

A decreasing trend was also observed in NSW, where 14,036 divorces were granted in 2024 compared to 14,789 in 2023.

De Facto Relationships: A Separate Set of Rules

It is worth noting that divorce in Australia is a concept that applies only to married couples. De facto couples — including same-sex couples who are not married — separate, but they do not divorce.

That said, de facto couples have legal rights that are broadly comparable to those of married couples when it comes to property settlements and parenting arrangements. Under the Family Law Act, de facto partners who have lived together for at least two years (or who have a child together, or who have made substantial contributions) can apply to the Federal Circuit and Family Court for property orders.

Legal Separation in Australia: Does It Officially Exist?

In Australia, there is no formal legal process called “legal separation” in the way that exists in some other countries — such as the United States, where couples can obtain a court-issued legal separation order that formally defines their obligations and rights while remaining married.

In Australia, separation is a factual state, not a legal status conferred by a court. The law recognises that you are separated when you have genuinely ended your relationship. There is no “decree of separation” issued by an Australian court.

What Australian couples can do, however, is formalise their arrangements through a Binding Financial Agreement (BFA). This is a legally binding document that sets out how assets, debts, and financial resources are to be divided between separated parties. It can be made before, during, or after a marriage or de facto relationship, and it can provide significant protection and certainty for both parties without the need to go to court.

A BFA must be drafted and executed carefully — each party must receive independent legal advice before signing — or it can be set aside by the court.

What Happens to Children?

Separation and divorce are entirely separate legal processes from parenting arrangements. Neither separation nor divorce automatically determines who children will live with or how much time they will spend with each parent.

Parenting matters are governed by Part VII of the Family Law Act, and the primary consideration is always the best interests of the child. Parents are strongly encouraged to try to reach their own parenting arrangements, with the assistance of family dispute resolution if needed.

If agreement cannot be reached, either parent can apply to the court for parenting orders. The court will consider a wide range of factors, including the benefit to the child of having a meaningful relationship with both parents, and the need to protect the child from harm.

One practical point: if you are applying for divorce and you have children under 18, the court will require a statement in your application explaining the arrangements in place for their care. The court will not grant a divorce if it is not satisfied that proper arrangements exist.

Practical First Steps If You Have Just Separated

If you have recently separated or are considering it, the most valuable thing you can do right now is seek legal advice. Not because the law is a minefield but because the decisions you make in the first weeks and months after separation tend to have the longest reach.

Here are some practical first steps:

  • Document the date of separation. Write it down, tell someone you trust, and keep any relevant evidence (such as emails or text messages that reflect the decision to separate).
  • Do not move assets. Both parties have financial disclosure obligations in any subsequent property proceedings. Moving, hiding, or disposing of assets during separation can have serious legal consequences.
  • Review your Will and superannuation nominations. These do not update themselves. Until they are changed, both documents continue to reflect the wishes of a relationship that no longer exists — which could mean your estranged spouse inherits your estate or receives your superannuation.
  • Seek independent legal advice before signing anything. A Binding Financial Agreement that has not been properly prepared can be challenged in court.
  • Consider family dispute resolution. Before heading to court over parenting arrangements, the law requires parents to make a genuine attempt at mediation (with some exceptions for family violence).

The Bottom Line

Divorce v separation in Australia is not a matter of two words for the same thing. They are two different legal realities, with different processes, different timelines, and different consequences.

Separation is where the emotional journey begins. Divorce, when it comes, is where the legal journey ends. In between lies some of the most consequential legal territory a person will ever navigate — property, children, finances, and the shape of life going forward.

You do not have to navigate this alone. With experienced legal guidance, the path from separation to resolution can be far clearer — and potentially far less painful — than most people expect.

If you have questions about separation or divorce, or need help moving forward, don’t hesitate to get in touch with one of our friendly Family Lawyers Central Coast.

5 Essential Elements of a Valid Will in NSW: What the Succession Act Requires

5 Essential Elements of a Valid Will in NSW

By Estate Planning

If you’re planning a Will or already have one, making sure it meets every essential element of a valid Will in NSW could be the most important legal step you ever take. Your family’s security, your life’s work, and your final wishes all depend on whether your Will satisfies specific legal requirements under New South Wales’s Succession Act 2006. Get them right, and everything you’ve built goes exactly where you want it to go. Miss even one, and the consequences can be heartbreaking — and very costly.

We know that’s a lot to take in. But here’s the reassuring part: these five elements are entirely achievable with the right guidance. At Felicio Law Firm, helping NSW families protect what matters most is what we do every single day.

But first, a reality check. Research by NSW Trustee and Guardian in 2023 found that 60% of NSW residents do not have a valid or legal Will in place. On top of that, family provision claims in NSW — where someone challenges a Will or an estate — numbered 1,461 in 2024 (ABC, 16 Sep 2025). And with an estimated $3.5 trillion set to transfer between Australian generations over the next 20 years, the stakes have never been higher for every Australian family.

So let’s walk through what the law actually requires.

The Legal Framework: NSW’s Succession Act 2006

In New South Wales, wills are governed by the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) (the “Act”). This is the legislation that sets out every requirement a will must satisfy to be legally valid. It’s the rulebook, and the NSW Supreme Court enforces it strictly.

When a Will is declared invalid, it’s treated as though it never existed. In that situation, your estate may be distributed according to the intestacy rules — a rigid legal formula that has no regard for your actual wishes, your relationships, or your circumstances. That outcome is entirely avoidable. Here are 5 essential elements you need to know.

Element 1: The Testator Must Be of Legal Age

Under the Act, a person making the Will (i.e., the testator) must generally be at least 18 years of age.

However, there are limited exceptions.

Under section 16 of the Act, a person under 18 (a “minor”) can make a formally valid Will with Supreme Court authorisation. However, the Court will only approve if it is satisfied the minor understands that:

  • the Will’s nature and property disposed;
  • it reflects their true intentions; and
  • the authorisation is reasonable in all circumstances.

Element 2: The Testator Must Have Testamentary Capacity

The testator must have testamentary capacity, or the mental ability to understand what they are doing, why they are doing it, and what effect it will have.

The legal test for testamentary capacity in Australian courts still comes from the landmark English case Banks v Goodfellow (1870), which NSW courts have consistently applied and affirmed.

Under this test, the testator must:

  • understand what a Will is and what it does;
  • have a reasonable understanding of the property they own and are giving away;
  • know who might reasonably expect to benefit — for example, a spouse, children, or other dependants; and
  • not be suffering from any disorder of the mind that distorts their judgment in a way that affects how they make the Will.

This is not an all-or-nothing test. A person with dementia or a psychiatric condition may still have capacity, depending on the nature and extent of their condition and the simplicity of the Will. Courts assess capacity at the time the Will is signed — or, if instructions were given earlier, at the time those instructions were provided.

Why does this element generate so much litigation? Because it is often raised after someone has died and can no longer speak for themselves. The evidence is retrospective — medical records, solicitor file notes, testimony from family and carers. When capacity is successfully challenged, the Will is void. That is why experienced estate planning solicitors document their assessment of a testator’s capacity carefully, and why a medical assessment is sometimes recommended.

We understand this is a sensitive area, especially when a parent or loved one’s health is declining. At Felicio Law Firm, we approach these situations with genuine compassion and care.

Element 3: The Will Must Be Made Freely and Voluntarily

A Will must be the genuine expression of the testator’s own wishes — made without undue influence, coercion, or fraud from any other person.

This doesn’t mean families can’t talk, suggest, or express preferences. Of course they can. Life is full of those conversations. What the law prohibits is pressure so overbearing that it substitutes someone else’s decision for the testator’s own. NSW courts draw a clear line between legitimate persuasion and coercion that overrides the testator’s independent judgment.

Undue influence tends to surface in situations where a vulnerable or elderly testator is heavily dependent on a carer who also stands to benefit, or where a Will is dramatically changed shortly before death without obvious reason. It also arises where the testator has been isolated from family and other trusted people.

But proving undue influence is notoriously difficult. The burden falls on the person challenging the Will, and the courts require solid evidence. But when it is proven, the affected gift — or the entire Will — can be set aside.

Fraudulent misrepresentation is a close cousin. If someone feeds false information to a testator — for example, telling them that a child has abandoned them when they haven’t — and the testator changes their will as a result, the courts can strike out that part of the Will. The testator’s true wishes deserve protection, and NSW law provides it.

Element 4: The Will Must Be in Writing and Properly Executed

This is the element that trips up the most homemade or Will kits. It is also the one where small mistakes can have enormous consequences.

Section 6 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) sets out clear formal requirements. For a will to be validly executed:

  • it must be in writing — handwritten, typed, or printed;
  • it must be signed by the testator, or by someone else in the testator’s presence and at their direction if the testator cannot physically sign;
  • the signature must be made or acknowledged by the testator in the simultaneous presence of at least two witnesses; and
  • both witnesses must sign the Will in the testator’s presence.

Every single step is mandatory. Courts have seen Wills fail because one witness stepped out of the room before the testator finished signing. Others have been challenged because the testator and witnesses signed on different days. These are not technicalities — they are the guardrails that prevent fraud and ensure the document is authentic.

One point deserves particular attention.

Under Section 10 of the Act, a gift to a witness — or to any person claiming under a witness — is generally void, even if the rest of the Will remains valid. However, this rule does not apply where at least two other witnesses are not beneficiaries, where all persons who would benefit from the avoidance of the gift consent in writing, or where the Court is satisfied the gift was made freely and with the testator’s knowledge and approval.

This is why witnesses should always be independent adults who receive nothing under the Will.

Element 5: The Will Must Reflect a Genuine Testamentary Intention

The fifth element is perhaps the most fundamental: the document must actually be intended to operate as a Will.

This means the testator must genuinely intend, at the time of making the document, that it will take effect as the legal disposal of their property upon their death. A letter written to a family member, a note in a diary, or a text message might express wishes — but they are not automatically a Will. Whether they qualify depends entirely on intent, and that question can only be resolved by a court.

Beyond intention, a well-drafted will needs certainty. Beneficiaries must be identifiable. Gifts must be described clearly enough to be administered. And while appointing an executor is not strictly a requirement for validity under the Act, having no executor creates real and entirely avoidable practical problems.

Vague language is a gift to litigators. When a Will says “to my children equally” but the testator had children from two different relationships — and only meant one set — the courts must interpret the Will. When “my house” refers to one of several properties, the ambiguity must be resolved. These disputes are costly, slow, and damaging to family relationships. Precise drafting, guided by an experienced Estate Planning Lawyer, prevents them before they begin.

What Happens if a Will is Invalid?

If a Will fails to satisfy any one of these five elements and is declared invalid, NSW’s intestacy rules under the Act apply. The estate is distributed according to a fixed legal formula, one that has nothing to do with your actual wishes.

The formula prioritises a surviving spouse or de facto partner, then children, then more distant relatives in a set order. If the deceased had children from a prior relationship, the distribution can become complicated and contested.

A de facto partner is only recognised under the intestacy rules if the relationship lasted at least two years or produced a child. A partner who does not meet this threshold receives nothing at all under the intestacy rules, regardless of how committed or long-standing the relationship appeared to be.

Also, friends, charities, and others you may have wanted to provide for receive nothing.

That’s why a valid Will, professionally prepared and kept up to date, is one of the most important things you can do for the people you love.

Protect Your Legacy

You have worked hard to build your life in NSW. Whether it’s your home, your business, your savings, or the relationship you want to protect — a valid Will is the foundation of all of it.

At Felicio Law Firm, our friendly team have been fostering relationships for a lifetime, providing compassionate, professional, and dedicated legal solutions to individuals, families, and small businesses across NSW. We offer high-value, personalised service that puts you first, and we take the time to get your estate planning right.

We can help you with your Will, powers of attorney, enduring guardian appointments, and a complete estate plan tailored to your circumstances. Expert legal solutions don’t have to be complicated or out of reach.

If you’re thinking about making or updating your Will, or if you’ve been putting it off because life got busy, please don’t wait any longer. Your family deserves that peace of mind.

Talk to one of our friendly team today.

Young businessman thinking about when to write a Will

Am I Too Young to Write a Will? Why Age Shouldn’t Delay Your Estate Planning

By Estate Planning

If you’re 18 or older, you’re not too young to write a Will in New South Wales.

Also, if you own assets, have superannuation, or care for dependants, it’s already the right time to make a Will.

Waiting could leave loved ones grappling with legal entanglements and financial distress. Real-life examples reported by major news outlets show just how common and costly this can be.

In one case, the sudden death of a 32-year-old man without a Will or enduring power of attorney left his family facing a five-year legal ordeal, involving superannuation, cryptocurrency, and even the care of pets, as highlighted by ABC News on 3 July 2024.

Similarly, the surprising death of One Direction star Liam Payne in October 2024 at just 31, without a Will, left a £24.3 million estate to be distributed according to government rules. The administration of this estate fell to his former partner and a lawyer.

Why Young People Should Think About Estate Planning

The idea that you need to be older or wealthy before you make a Will is a common misconception—and a dangerous one. Under NSW law, if you pass away without a valid Will, your estate is dealt with under intestacy rules. That means government legislation, not your personal wishes, decides how your assets are distributed. For grieving families, this process can drag on for months, creating stress, delays, and unnecessary costs.

Even if you don’t think you own much, most young adults in NSW have more to their name than they realise. Consider:

  • Superannuation funds (often with insurance benefits included)
  • Equity in property, even with a mortgage
  • Bank accounts, shares, or managed funds
  • Vehicles, electronics, and jewellery
  • Digital assets, such as cryptocurrency, online businesses, or valuable social media accounts

Superannuation alone can be a major asset. Without proper death benefit nominations, the trustee decides who receives it, often after lengthy investigations. This can delay financial support for the people who need it most.

Estate planning lawyers like ours often advise young adults to consider not just a Will but also enduring powers of attorney and advance health directives. These documents ensure someone you trust can take charge of your financial, legal, or medical affairs if you’re no longer able to.

Legal requirements for a valid Will in NSW

  • Minimum age: You must be 18 or older for your Will to be legally effective in NSW.
  • Testamentary capacity: You must have the mental ability to understand the nature of the document, its consequences, and how you want your estate distributed.
  • Formal Requirements: Under Section 6 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) (the Act), a Will must meet the following conditions:
    • Be written down.
    • Be signed by the person making the Will (called the testator), or someone else signing it in their presence and at their direction.
    • The testator must sign or confirm their signature while at least two witnesses watch together.
    • At least two of those witnesses must then sign the Will while the testator watches (the witnesses don’t have to sign at the same time).

Limited Exceptions for Minors:

  • Marriage Exception: A Will made by a minor (person under 18) is valid only if made in contemplation of a marriage that takes place, or if the minor is married.
  • Court Approval: The court can approve a Will under Section 16 of the Act for minors in specific circumstances
  • Statutory Wills: Sections 18 to 26 of the Act allow the Supreme Court to authorise wills for those lacking testamentary capacity, including minors

However, any person younger than 18 seeking to make a Will requires expert legal advice due to the complex requirements.

The Consequences of Not Having a Will in NSW

Consider a 27-year-old who suddenly lost their spouse, leaving a baby behind. The spouse had no Will and left a mortgaged house, superannuation, and potential compensation claims related to the death. These circumstances can create several serious consequences, including:

  • Delays in accessing money: Banks, superannuation funds, and other institutions may require extra paperwork before releasing funds.
  • Uncertainty about who inherits: Intestacy laws determine beneficiaries, which may not match your intentions. Spouses, children, or other family members may receive different shares than you would have wanted.
  • Complicated legal processes: Estates can take many months—or even over a year—to finalise, particularly if superannuation or other assets are involved.
  • Extra costs: Legal fees, administrative expenses, and interest on unpaid bills can quickly add up while your family waits for access to funds.
  • Potential disputes: Family members may disagree over entitlements, leading to stress, tension, or even court proceedings.

This example shows that writing a Will is not just for the elderly or wealthy. Losing a spouse is one of the most stressful experiences anyone can face, and a Will can help reduce the financial and legal burden during this difficult time. Your valid Will would serve both as a record of your wishes and as protection for the people you care about most.

When Should You Consider Writing a Will?

You should make a Will as soon as you have assets, responsibilities, or people who rely on you. Some key moments include:

  • Buying property: Even with a mortgage, your home has equity that should be properly directed. If you co-own with a partner or friend, you also need to understand how joint tenancy or tenancy in common affects your estate.
  • Starting a family: Parents of young children must plan for guardianship, inheritance management, and trusts to safeguard their children’s future.
  • Building investments: Shares, managed funds, and superannuation accounts can grow quickly. Without a Will, they may not end up where you’d want.
  • Owning a business: Even small businesses, partnerships, or freelance ventures may have valuable assets, contracts, and intellectual property that require proper succession planning.

Common Mistakes Young Adults Make

Many people postpone estate planning because it feels overwhelming or not urgent. make mistakes such as:

  • Procrastination: Assuming you’ll get to it “later”. Unfortunately, accidents and illnesses don’t wait for the right time.
  • Not updating beneficiary nominations: Outdated superannuation or insurance nominations can override your current wishes.
  • Forgetting digital assets: Cryptocurrencies, domain names, or online businesses may be overlooked, leaving beneficiaries without access.

To learn more about these common mistakes, read our article here.

Why You Should Get Professional Help

Online templates can seem tempting, but they don’t account for complex family situations, blended families, or assets like superannuation and business interests. Experienced Estate Planning Lawyers like ours understand NSW succession law and can help you create a Will that works alongside your nominations, insurance, and tax planning.

We will also ensure your estate plan evolves with you. As you move through life stages—buying property, marrying, having children, or building wealth—your Will and other documents need to be reviewed and updated. We’re here to help.

Start Making Your Will Today

Take note, writing a Will isn’t about being old or rich. It’s about being prepared. Every adult in NSW with assets, superannuation, or dependants should take steps to protect their loved ones. Estate planning provides peace of mind that your wishes will be respected and your family won’t face unnecessary legal or financial hardship.

Our Estate Planning Lawyers Central Coast can help you write strong, practical estate plans that truly reflect your wishes. No matter if it’s your first Will, an update to reflect new circumstances, or more complicated issues like superannuation and business structures, we’ll walk you through the process with care.

We understand that starting the conversation about estate planning can feel daunting, especially when you’re young. But taking this step now is one of the most responsible decisions you can make.

Reach out to one of our expert Central Coast Wills & Estate Planning Lawyers today for a private consultation. Gain peace of mind knowing your loved ones will be cared for, no matter what the future holds.

Woman talking to a lawyer about severing joint tenancy

Severing Joint Tenancy: What Property Owners Need to Know

By Conveyancing, Estate Planning, Family Law

For many property owners, severing joint tenancy is an important step when circumstances change. While holding property as joint tenants might seem simple at first, it comes with significant consequences: if one owner dies, the property automatically passes to the surviving owner, regardless of what the deceased’s Will says.

That arrangement can suit some families, but in situations like second marriages, blended families, or when co-owners want more control over who inherits their share, it can cause real issues. Joint tenancy can be ended by one owner acting alone, all owners agreeing together, or through the owners consistently acting like they own separate shares. These methods convert ownership to a tenancy in common and allow you to direct your share through your Will or broader estate plan.

Understanding Joint Tenancy and Its Implications

Joint tenancy creates a unique form of property ownership where all owners hold equal interests with identical rights. The defining characteristic is the right of survivorship, which means that when one joint tenant dies, their interest automatically passes to the surviving joint tenant(s), regardless of any contrary provisions in their Will.

This automatic transfer occurs outside the probate process, which can seem advantageous initially. However, it creates significant complications in family law matters and estate planning, particularly for blended families where individuals may want their children from previous relationships to inherit their property share.

Other features of joint tenancy include:

  • All owners have equal rights to use and occupy the entire property.
  • Each co-owner holds an identical share or interest in the property.
  • Ownership comes from the same document or transaction.
  • All owners’ interests start at the same time.

When Severing Joint Tenancy Becomes Essential

Severing joint tenancy is often a wise step in family law and estate planning. It prevents a former partner from automatically inheriting property if one owner dies after a relationship breakdown.

For blended families, the severance allows parents to direct their share to children from previous relationships, which is especially important when significant property values are involved.

Consider these common scenarios where severance proves beneficial:

  • Second marriages where each spouse has children from previous relationships
  • Business partnerships requiring clear succession planning for heirs
  • Investment properties held with non-family members
  • Family disputes where relationships have deteriorated
  • Tax planning strategies requiring specific ownership structures

By ending a joint tenancy, property is ensured to be distributed according to the owner’s wishes, protecting the interests of all intended beneficiaries.

Methods of Severing Joint Tenancy

Unilateral Severance

In NSW, one joint tenant can sever the tenancy without the others’ consent. This is done by preparing and registering a transfer form that converts the severing party’s interest to a tenancy in common, removing the right of survivorship. While useful in difficult relationships or urgent estate planning, registration usually notifies the other joint tenants of the change.

Mutual Agreement

Joint tenants can also end their tenancy by mutual agreement, with all parties executing transfer documents together. This approach provides clarity, avoids disputes over timing, and is often more cost-effective when everyone cooperates.

Other Means

Certain circumstances automatically sever joint tenancy without specific action by the owners. These situations include:

  • Bankruptcy of one joint tenant, causing their interest to vest in the trustee
  • Conduct by the owners that shows they treat the property as divided into separate shares, such as referring to “my half” and “your half,” which can be taken as severing the joint tenancy even without formal paperwork.

Understanding these severance triggers helps property owners anticipate potential changes to their ownership structure and plan accordingly.

Legal Requirements and Documentation

To end a joint tenancy, formal documents must be correctly drafted to show a clear intention to sever it. Ambiguous language can make the severance ineffective, so professional preparation ensures full compliance with legal requirements.

The documentation must include:

  • Clear identification of the property and all current joint tenants
  • A clear declaration of the decision to sever the joint tenancy
  • Proper execution with appropriate witnessing and signing requirements
  • Accurate legal descriptions matching registered title documents
  • Compliance with obligations to pay stamp duty and registration fees.

Remember, the severance document must be registered with the land registry to take effect; unregistered documents do not sever the joint tenancy. Processing can take days to weeks, so timing is important in urgent situations.

Impact on Estate Planning and Wills

How you own property affects what happens to it when you pass away. If you own property as joint tenants, you cannot leave your share to someone in your Will. This is because the right of survivorship applies.

If you instead hold the property as tenants in common, each owner’s share becomes part of their estate. This allows you to leave your share to beneficiaries under your Will, use trusts for children or vulnerable beneficiaries, and make more flexible tax and succession plans.

Some key estate planning advantages of holding property as tenants in common include:

  • Freedom to direct your share of property in your Will
  • Ability to create trusts for children or dependants
  • Strategic tax planning opportunities
  • Greater protection from creditors in some cases
  • Clearer guidance for executors in administering the estate

It’s also important to regularly review your superannuation death benefit nominations and life insurance policies, as these do not automatically follow the terms of your Will. This is especially crucial in blended families, where careful planning ensures children from earlier relationships and a current spouse are both properly provided for.

Considerations for Family Law Matters

In family law property settlements, severing joint tenancy can be strategically important. It prevents a former partner from automatically inheriting property if one party dies before settlement, protecting each owner’s estate planning intentions. However, timing is crucial, as courts may view severance during proceedings as an attempt to defeat legitimate claims, so professional legal advice ensures it’s done correctly.

Tax Implications and Financial Considerations

Ending a joint tenancy can trigger tax consequences, including capital gains tax on appreciated property and potential stamp duty, which vary by circumstances.

Financial planning considerations include:

  • Income tax implications for rental properties
  • Estate planning tax strategies post-severance
  • Superannuation death benefit integration

Getting professional tax advice helps you structure the severance in a way that avoids unnecessary tax problems while still achieving your estate planning goals.

Practical Steps and Professional Assistance

  • Assess your goals: Ensure severing joint tenancy aligns with your estate planning, property objectives, family circumstances, and potential tax implications.
  • Prepare documentation carefully: Transfer forms must clearly state the intention to sever and comply with statutory requirements. Professional preparation reduces the risk of errors that could invalidate the severance.
  • Complete registration: Submit properly executed documents to the relevant land registry. Processing times and fees vary, but professional guidance can streamline the process.

Potential Complications and Pitfalls

Complications can arise if transfer documents are incorrect or unclear, leaving the joint tenancy intact and causing problems later.

Common pitfalls include:

  • Insufficient legal descriptions causing registration rejection
  • Improper execution, invalidating the transfer document
  • Timing conflicts with other legal proceedings
  • Third-party consent requirements being overlooked
  • Tax implications not being properly considered

Additionally, timing can complicate severance, particularly during active family law proceedings, as it may conflict with existing court orders. Furthermore, third-party interests, such as mortgages or caveats, can create additional hurdles, often requiring extra consents.

Conclusion

Severing joint tenancy gives property owners greater control over their estate planning, eliminating the automatic right of survivorship and allowing property interests to be directed through Wills. For blended families or those involved in family law matters, it is often a crucial step to ensure testamentary wishes are respected and loved ones are provided for.

If you have questions about joint tenancy severance or are ready to begin, our experienced Conveyancing Lawyers Central Coast, Family Lawyers Central Coast, and Wills & Estate Planning Lawyers Central Coast can guide you through the process. We ensure all legal requirements are met while protecting your interests and those of your beneficiaries. Contact our friendly team today.

 

Seller talks to a couple about a house, including disclosures for property sales in Queensland.

Property Sales in Queensland: Mandatory Seller Disclosure Scheme Now in Effect

By Conveyancing

In Queensland, property sales have undergone a huge shake-up from 1 August 2025, with a new mandatory seller disclosure scheme bringing an end to decades of “buyer beware” rules. No longer will buyers be blindsided by contaminated land notices, surprise body corporate debts, or hidden planning restrictions after settlement. Instead, the state’s property market is now moving into a new chapter, one defined by clarity and disclosure.

Under the Property Law Act 2023, sellers are now legally required to provide a full picture of the property upfront, before contracts are signed. This reform completely changes the way property sales are handled, giving buyers clearer information from the start and holding sellers to higher standards. Whether you’re selling your family home, an investment property, or a commercial building, these reforms will directly shape your next property deal.

Why This Change Is So Important

Comprehensive disclosure

Sellers are now legally required to reveal far more than just the basics. The new disclosure obligations cover the property’s legal status, encumbrances, physical condition, and any issues that could influence a buyer’s decision. This includes:

  • unpaid rates
  • environmental listings
  • pool safety compliance
  • building notices.

In practice, it means buyers won’t face nasty surprises after settlement, such as unexpected fees or restrictions that affect how they use the property.

Standardised documentation

Every seller must complete the official Form 2 Seller Disclosure Statement and attach prescribed certificates from councils, government authorities, and body corporates. This uniform approach removes guesswork for buyers and ensures consistency across all property sales in Queensland. Whether you’re comparing an apartment in Brisbane or a rural block in Rockhampton, you’ll be able to weigh up properties on a fair and equal basis.

Serious legal consequences

If sellers fail to comply, even unintentionally, buyers can walk away from the deal by exercising their termination rights. This flips the power balance, placing accountability squarely on sellers to get disclosure right the first time.

National consistency

Queensland has finally caught up with states like New South Wales and Victoria, which already operate under disclosure regimes. This alignment is particularly helpful for interstate investors and developers, who no longer have to navigate vastly different rules when engaging in property sales across borders. The result is greater market confidence and smoother interstate transactions.

The new rules apply to all contracts entered into on or after 1 August 2025, even if the property was listed for sale before that date.

Understanding Your Legal Obligations

Under Part 7, Division 4 of the Property Law Act 2023, every seller must provide two essential components before a buyer signs a contract:

  • Form 2 Seller Disclosure Statement: This acts like the property’s medical record, covering everything from lot and plan details to encumbrances, tenancies, and planning restrictions.

For decades, sellers relied on buyers to do their own checks; now, the onus has shifted. Sellers must be upfront and thorough, or risk losing the deal.

  • Prescribed certificates: These certificates, issued by councils and government bodies, must be current. A seller can no longer recycle an outdated council search from years ago—the documents must reflect the property’s situation at the time of sale.

Accuracy is non-negotiable. Any error, omission, or outdated certificate can give buyers the right to walk away.

What Information Must You Disclose?

The disclosure obligations cover four broad categories:

1. Property Fundamentals and Legal Status

  • Registered encumbrances: Mortgages, easements for utilities, or covenants restricting use must be disclosed. For example, an easement allowing council access across your backyard isn’t something a buyer should discover after settlement.
  • Unregistered encumbrances: Informal agreements, verbal easements, or disputes with neighbours must also be revealed. Even handshake agreements carry legal weight under this scheme.
  • Tenancy agreements: Rent details, expiry dates, and tenant rights must be disclosed. Buyers need clarity on the obligations they’re inheriting.
  • Rates and water assessments: Up-to-date council rates and water charges, including any overdue balances, must be included so buyers don’t inherit hidden debts.

2. Environmental and Planning Considerations

  • Zoning classification: These determine the land that can be used. For example, a buyer wanting to operate a café will face issues if the zoning is strictly residential.
  • Heritage listings: These restrict renovations, demolitions, and external modifications. These can be deal-breakers for developers.
  • Contaminated land: Listings on the Environmental Management Register or Contaminated Land Register must be revealed. Contamination can severely impact value and usage.
  • Infrastructure projects: Planned highways or rail lines affecting the property must be disclosed.
  • Land resumption notices: If government intends to acquire part of the property, buyers must know upfront.
  • Tree orders and disputes: Tree removal restrictions or ongoing neighbour disputes must be disclosed, helping avoid bitter surprises later.

3. Building and Structural Matters

  • Pool safety compliance: Buyers must be told whether pools meet safety standards or require upgrades.
  • Outstanding building notices: Show cause or enforcement notices from authorities cannot be hidden.
  • Owner-builder work: Work done under an owner-builder permit within six years must be disclosed, as warranty obligations apply.
  • Recent planning approvals: Any newly approved extensions or renovations must be revealed, even if not yet on council systems.

4. Community Titles Schemes

  • Body corporate levies and fees: Buyers should know ongoing financial commitments.
  • Insurance and sinking fund balances: Help buyers gauge the scheme’s financial health.
  • Disputes or outstanding contributions: Transparency here protects buyers from inheriting unresolved conflicts.

How These Changes Have Transformed Property Sales

Previously, sellers had minimal disclosure obligations, creating information gaps, disputes, and inconsistency across the market. Some sellers were open, while others disclosed as little as possible.

Now, every buyer receives the same baseline information, and every seller follows the same rules. This levels the playing field and builds trust across property sales in Queensland.

Why This Matters for Everyone

For Buyers:

  • Informed decisions: No more guessing games; buyers know what they’re committing to.
  • Reduced risks: Post-settlement surprises are less likely.
  • Legal protection: Termination rights exist until settlement if disclosure is defective.

For Sellers:

  • Clear framework: Reduces uncertainty and liability.
  • Smoother settlements: Informed buyers mean fewer disputes and delays.
  • Market confidence: Transparency can make properties more attractive.

For the Market:

  • Consistency: One process for all.
  • Reduced litigation: Fewer court cases over nondisclosure.
  • Professional standards: Agents, lawyers, and sellers must operate at a higher level.

Auctions, Exemptions, and Special Cases

The scheme also applies to auctions. Sellers must provide disclosure documents to registered bidders before the auction begins. Since contracts form immediately at the fall of the hammer, preparation and document delivery are critical.

Exemptions include:

  • Government and corporate sales.
  • Related-party transactions with written waivers.
  • High-value commercial sales over $10 million (if waived).
  • Off-the-plan sales (already regulated).
  • Statutory sales, such as council rate recoveries.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

The penalties are serious. Buyers may terminate if sellers:

  • Fail to provide disclosure.
  • Provide inaccurate information.
  • Deliver incomplete or outdated certificates.

Termination rights last until settlement, leaving sellers exposed if they get it wrong.

What Buyers Still Need to Check

Despite the broad scheme, buyers should still conduct their own due diligence. Sellers don’t need to disclose:

  • Structural integrity or engineering soundness
  • Flood history (unless officially recorded)
  • Old planning approvals
  • Utility service availability
  • Asbestos
  • Certain vegetation restrictions

Inspections, searches, and specialist advice remain essential.

Preparing for Success Under the New Scheme

For sellers, preparation is key:

  • Consult an experienced Property Lawyer like ours to clarify obligations.
  • Gather documents early to avoid delays.
  • Order council and body corporate searches in advance.
  • Keep records of document delivery.

This is not just about compliance; it’s about protecting the sale and ensuring settlement proceeds smoothly.

Looking Toward Queensland’s Property Future

Beyond paperwork, this scheme is a cultural shift. It prioritises transparency, reduces disputes, and builds trust in property sales. Long-term, it should:

  • Increase market confidence.
  • Reduce litigation.
  • Protect buyers.
  • Encourage professional excellence.

Conclusion

As of 1 August 2025, Queensland’s seller disclosure scheme has reshaped how property sales work. The days of “buyer beware” are over, replaced by a framework of mandatory transparency that benefits buyers, sellers, and the broader market.

At Felicio Law Firm, our experienced Central Coast Conveyancing Lawyers are already guiding sellers through the new regime. From preparing disclosure statements to managing settlement, we ensure your sale complies with every requirement and protects your interests. Whether you’re selling a family home, an investment property, or a commercial building, our expertise in Queensland’s evolving property laws means you can navigate these changes with confidence.

Selling property in Queensland? Don’t hesitate to get in touch with us today.

Middle-aged man talking to a lawyer about how to remove an executor

Why and How to Remove an Executor of a Will in NSW

By Estate Planning

Removing an executor of a Will in NSW may be necessary if the person appointed to manage the estate is delaying, refusing to act, or mismanaging assets. Executors are expected to administer the estate fairly and promptly — but what happens when they don’t?

This guide explains the grounds for removal of an executor and what the process involves.

What Are the Responsibilities of an Executor in NSW?

An executor has the legal duty to handle and complete the administration of a deceased person’s estate. In NSW, their key duties include:

  • Applying for probate (if required)
  • Collecting and protecting estate assets
  • Paying debts and taxes
  • Distributing the estate to beneficiaries
  • Keeping clear records and accounts

Executors must act in the best interests of the estate, avoid conflicts of interest, and follow the Will’s instructions. But if that person becomes unfit, unwilling, or unable to perform those duties, beneficiaries or other interested parties may apply to the NSW Supreme Court to have them removed.

When Can You Remove an Executor of a Will in NSW?

The Court will not remove an executor simply because of a disagreement. There must be strong legal grounds. These include:

  • Misconduct or dishonesty: Using estate funds for personal purposes, failing to keep records, or acting in favour of certain beneficiaries over others are all serious breaches.
  • Negligence or delay: If the estate has not been managed properly or the executor is causing unreasonable delays (e.g., not applying for probate), this may justify removal.
  • Refusal to act: If an executor is ignoring their duties or refuses to respond to requests from beneficiaries, legal action may be required.
  • Incapacity: Mental or physical incapacity, including illness, dementia, or absence overseas, can prevent an executor from fulfilling their obligations.
  • Conflict of interest: Situations where the executor’s personal interests compromise their objectivity may also lead to removal.
  • Fraud or criminal behaviour: Engaging in dishonest conduct, such as forging documents or misappropriating funds, is a clear ground for removal.

Examples of Executor Misconduct in Australia

These scenarios commonly arise in legal proceedings:

  • An executor sold the deceased’s home to a relative at a heavily discounted price.
  • The executor failed to pay taxes owed by the estate, resulting in penalties.
  • A beneficiary repeatedly asked for updates, but the executor ignored all communication.
  • The executor used estate funds to pay off their personal debts.

If you suspect similar behaviour, it may be time to explore your legal options.

What If the Executor Refuses to Distribute the Estate?

In NSW, executors are expected to distribute the estate within a “reasonable time” — typically within 12 months of death. If that doesn’t happen, and no good reason is provided, beneficiaries may take legal action. This could involve:

  • Sending a formal letter requesting action
  • Applying to the Court to compel distribution
  • Filing an application to remove the Executor altogether

Delays caused by tax issues or property sales may be justified, but complete inaction or avoidance is not.

What’s the Legal Process to Remove an Executor in NSW?

In NSW, removing an executor requires a formal application to the Supreme Court — but only if there are solid reasons. Courts don’t take the decision lightly and will only act if the executor is clearly unfit or unable to perform their duties.

Step 1: Seek Legal Advice

Start by speaking with an experienced lawyer, such as one of our Estate Planning Lawyers Central Coast. We’ll help you assess whether your concerns meet the legal threshold for removal and advise you on the best course of action. This first step is crucial, as not every case will justify court intervention.

Step 2: Collect Supporting Evidence

To persuade the Court, you’ll need to show clear grounds for removal.

Gathering documentation early — including emails, timelines, and financial records — strengthens your case and may even prompt the executor to step aside voluntarily.

Note: If the executor hasn’t applied for probate yet, they can formally renounce the role by filing with the Court. This avoids a contested application, and another eligible party can step in without a hearing — unless there’s a dispute.

Step 3: File Your Court Application

Next, your lawyer will prepare and lodge a removal application in the Supreme Court, supported by affidavits and evidence. All relevant parties, including the executor and beneficiaries, must be formally notified.

Step 4: Attend the Court Hearing

If there’s a dispute, the case will go to a court hearing. Both sides present evidence, and the Court will decide whether the executor’s removal is in the best interests of the estate — not just the wishes of the beneficiaries.

What Happens After an Executor Is Removed?

If the Court removes an executor, it must ensure the estate is properly managed by appointing someone else to take over the role.

1. Appointing a Replacement Executor

If the Will names a substitute or alternate executor who is eligible and willing to act, the Court may authorise them to take over the administration of the estate.

Where co-executors were originally appointed, the Court may also decide that the remaining executor(s) can continue managing the estate without the need for a replacement.

2. Appointing an Administrator

If no alternate executor is named, or if all named executors are unwilling or unable to act, the Court may appoint an administrator instead. This person could be:

  • A principal beneficiary
  • A neutral third party (such as a solicitor or trustee company)
  • The NSW Trustee & Guardian, if no suitable private individual is available

A beneficiary or even a creditor of the estate may apply to be appointed as administrator. The Court will select the person best placed to carry out the estate’s administration fairly and efficiently.

What Are the Legal Costs of Removing an Executor?

The cost varies based on complexity and whether the matter is contested. Here are some estimates:

  • Simple, uncontested removal: $10,000 to $20,000
  • Contested proceedings: $30,000 to $100,000 or more

Court filing fees, legal representation, and expert reports can all add to the expense. If you win the case, the costs may be reimbursed from the estate — but if you lose, you could be ordered to pay the other side’s legal fees too.

How Long Does It Take to Remove an Executor?

Again, this varies depending on the complexity of the case. Here are some typical time frames:

  • Uncontested cases: Around 3–6 months
  • Contested matters: 12–18 months or longer

Delays are often caused by court backlogs, evidence gathering, and negotiation between parties.

During this time, the estate may not progress, and assets may be frozen — so early action is important.

Conclusion

Removing an executor of a Will in NSW is a serious legal step — but sometimes, it’s necessary to protect the estate and ensure the deceased’s wishes are honoured. Whether due to misconduct, incapacity, delay, or outright refusal to act, the law gives beneficiaries the tools to seek justice.

Make sure you understand your rights and the risks before taking action. The process involves strong evidence, proper legal steps, and may take months or longer — especially if contested.

How Our Estate Planning Lawyers Can Help

We help clients across NSW navigate the complex process of executor removal. From initial advice to full representation in the Supreme Court, we guide you every step of the way. We’ll review your case, collect the necessary proof, and move quickly to safeguard your inheritance and peace of mind.

Concerned about how an estate is being managed or want to prevent future disputes? Contact one of our Central Coast Wills & Estate Planning Lawyers for a confidential consultation and clear advice on your next steps.

Neighbours consulting about how to register an easement

What Is and How to Register an Easement in NSW in 2025: A Guide

By Conveyancing

Registering an easement in New South Wales (NSW) involves a legal process that allows a property owner to use a portion of another’s land for a specific purpose, such as access, drainage, or utilities. Knowing the various types of easements and the steps to register them is essential for property owners, developers, and anyone engaged in real estate dealings. This article outlines the key steps to register an easement and the various types of easements you may encounter in NSW.

What are Easements in NSW?

An easement is a legal right that allows one property owner to use another person’s land for a specific purpose, such as access, drainage, or utility installation, without owning the land. It grants enduring, enforceable rights that remain valid even if the land changes ownership. However, easements do not transfer land ownership. These simply allow certain uses of the land.

In property law:

  • Dominant Tenement: The property that gains the benefit of the easement..
  • Servient Tenement: The property that is burdened by the easement.

For example, if you need to cross a neighbour’s property to access the street, your property is the dominant tenement, while the neighbour’s property is the servient tenement.

Easements in NSW are regulated by:

  • Real Property Act 1900 (NSW): Regulates the process pf registering easements on Torrens title properties.
  • Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW): Provides the legal framework for creating, modifying, and removing easements, ensuring they are enforceable.
  • Common Law Principles: Help define the rights and obligations related to easements through court rulings.

Types of Easements in NSW

Classification by Legal Origin

Type

Description Legal Basis

Notes

Express Easements

Created by mutual agreement between parties Agreement between parties, registered with NSW Land Registry Services

Most commonly used type of easement in NSW

Implied Easements

Arise from necessity or implied intention Common law principles

Includes easements for landlocked properties

Prescriptive Easements

Arise from long-term, uninterrupted use Minimum 20 years of continuous use “as of right”

Can be valid on Torrens title land, but rare

Statutory Easements

Created or imposed by legislation

Conveyancing Act 1919, Strata Schemes Development Act 2015, etc.

Typically created for public infrastructure needs

Classification by Purpose

Purpose

Description Common Creation Methods Examples
Access Easements

Allow passage or access across another’s land

Express, Prescriptive, Implied

Right of Way, Right of Carriageway

Service/Utility Easements

Permit installation and maintenance of services

Express, Statutory

Electricity, water, sewerage, gas, telecommunications

Drainage Easements

Allow water flow across properties

Express, Statutory

Stormwater drainage, watercourse maintenance

Support Easements

Provide structural support between adjoining properties

Express, Statutory

Party walls, excavation support

Light and Air Easements

Preserve access to natural light or airflow Express

Solar access, ventilation corridors

Positive vs. Negative Easements

Type

Description Frequency

Positive Easements

The right to use or do something on another’s land

Most common

Negative Easements The right to prevent actions on another’s land

Less common

Understanding which easement applies to your situation is essential before learning how to register an easement in NSW. Additionally, if the land involved is Crown land (public land managed by the government), extra requirements under the Crown Land Management Act 2016 may apply. These include ministerial approval and assessments to ensure the easement aligns with public interest.

Why Register an Easement?

Registering an easement formalises your right to use part of someone else’s land and ensures it’s legally binding—even after a change in ownership. Common reasons to register include:

  • Access to a landlocked property
  • Utility or drainage requirements
  • Council development consent conditions
  • Legalising informal arrangements
  • Protecting development plans or resale value

Without registration, informal rights may be unenforceable, creating legal risks and property value concerns.

How to Register an Easement in NSW: Step-by-Step

Registering an easement requires planning, negotiation, legal documentation, and lodgement with NSW Land Registry Services. Here’s a simplified guide:

Step 1: Determine the Need for an Easement

Before anything else, confirm the easement is necessary and meets the legal threshold:

  • It benefits the land itself (not just the current owner)
  • It relates to a recognised type of easement
  • Alternatives (like purchasing the land) have been considered

Step 2: Negotiate with the Other Party

For voluntary easements, start by negotiating with the servient landowner to agree on the terms:

  • Clarify the purpose, location, and use conditions
  • Offer fair compensation if needed
  • Document everything in writing

Successful negotiation avoids costly court proceedings.

Step 3: Arrange a Survey

A registered land surveyor must create a detailed plan showing:

  • The proposed easement’s location and size
  • Any physical features it affects
  • Relationship to property boundaries

This plan is essential for legal documentation and lodgement.

Step 4: Prepare the Right Documents

Depending on your scenario, you’ll use either:

Document Type When It’s Used
Transfer Granting Easement (Form 01TG) Used when both properties are Torrens Title
Section 88B Instrument Used when part of a deposited plan (e.g. during subdivision)

Each document must include:

  • Land titles for both properties
  • Full easement terms and conditions
  • Survey plan references
  • Signatures of both parties
  • Stamp duty assessment (if applicable)

Step 5: Obtain Required Consents

You’ll need written consent from:

  • Both property owners
  • Mortgagees or banks with an interest in either title
  • Councils or Roads Authorities (for public land)

Failure to obtain these can delay or invalidate registration.

Step 6: Lodge with NSW Land Registry Services

You have two options:

  1. Electronic Lodgement (PEXA)
  • Create a Residual Document workspace
  • Add land title and parties
  • Upload legal documents and digital signatures
  • Finalise stamp duty (if needed)
  • Submit for registration
  1. Paper Lodgement
  • Submit documents in person or via post
  • Pay the registration fee
  • Allow processing time for confirmation

Step 7: Registration Complete

Once approved:

  • The easement is officially recorded on both land titles
  • It becomes legally enforceable
  • Any future owners must comply with its terms

Different Title Scenarios

NSW has both Torrens and Old System titles. This affects your lodgement process.

Dominant Tenement Servient Tenement Process
Torrens Title Torrens Title Standard registration
Torrens Title Old System Requires a Primary Application
Old System Torrens Title Easement registration + deed
Old System Old System Convert titles + deed registration

Easement Disputes and What to Do If You Can’t Agree

Disagreements about easements often involve access, use, or maintenance. Common issues include:

  • Obstructing or blocking the easement
  • Using the easement for unintended purposes
  • Uncertainty over maintenance responsibilities

Start by trying to resolve the issue directly with the other party. If negotiation fails, mediation may help.

As a last resort, you can apply to the NSW Supreme Court under Section 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) to impose or modify an easement. The Court will consider:

  • Whether the easement is reasonably necessary
  • The public interest
  • Whether compensation is appropriate
  • Whether you’ve attempted to negotiate

Court proceedings can be complex and expensive, so seek legal advice before taking this step.

Easement Maintenance and Conditions

The registered document should outline:

  • Who maintains the easement
  • Permitted and prohibited uses
  • Rights to enter for repairs
  • Whether compensation is ongoing

In the absence of terms, common law places maintenance on the dominant tenement.

Important Lessons from Maloney v Putu Pty Ltd (2023)

In Maloney v Putu Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1148, a landowner successfully claimed legal rights to use an access road across his neighbor’s property after decades of continuous use.

The Key Issue

The court had to decide whether the landowner’s use of the access road was by permission (which would defeat his claim) or “as of right” (which would support it).

Why the Court Recognised the Easement

The court ruled in favour of the easement by prescription because:

  • No clear evidence showed express permission was ever granted
  • The landowner maintained the road and acted as if entitled to use it
  • Various people used the road openly for decades without restriction
  • When selling, the previous owner acknowledged the road “has always been used” by the claimant

Important Takeaways for Property Owners

  • Using someone’s land openly for 20+ years can create legal rights even without documentation
  • Simply tolerating a neighbor’s use is not the same as granting permission
  • Prescriptive easements can exist even on Torrens title properties
  • Buyers should investigate undocumented access ways, not just rely on title searches

This case highlights the distinction between permission (which prevents prescriptive rights) and mere tolerance (which allows them to develop), offering valuable guidance for property disputes in NSW.

Should I Engage a Lawyer?

You should consult a lawyer when:

  • Negotiations are complex or stalled
  • Documentation is unclear or high-value
  • Mixed title systems are involved
  • Easement terms must be custom drafted
  • You’re considering a Section 88K application

Our experienced Central Coast Conveyancing Lawyers ensures the process is handled correctly and minimises the risk of future disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions About Easements in NSW

What if my neighbour builds over an easement?

Building over an easement may be illegal if it blocks access or use. You can ask them to remove the structure, and if they refuse, seek legal advice or court intervention.

Can an old easement be removed?

Yes. If the easement is no longer needed or used, you can apply to the NSW Supreme Court to have it modified or removed under the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW).

Do easements affect property value?

They can. Minor easements often have little impact, but larger or poorly located ones can reduce usable land and affect value.

What if the easement covers most of my land?

If an easement affects a large portion of your property, it may limit development. Legal advice can help explore modification or compensation options.

What if an easement wasn’t disclosed before I bought the property?

You may have legal options if a hidden easement affects your use of the land—such as contract cancellation, compensation, or legal action for nondisclosure.

Protecting Your Property Interests in 2025

Knowing how to register an easement in NSW puts you in control of your property rights. Whether you’re providing access to land, securing utility routes, or meeting development conditions, a registered easement gives you legal certainty that stands the test of time—even if ownership changes.

The process can be straightforward with the right planning, clear documentation, and professional guidance. Our expert Conveyancing Lawyers Central Coast can assist you with everything from negotiation to registration. We’ll help you avoid costly mistakes and ensure your easement is legally enforceable and aligned with your goals.

Need help registering an easement in NSW? Get in touch with us today for personalised practical advice.

Female buyer and seller agreeing on vendor finance

Vendor Finance: What It Is and How to Protect Yourself

By Conveyancing

Vendor finance is an increasingly popular alternative when traditional financing is unavailable. In this arrangement, the seller acts as the lender, allowing the buyer to make payments directly. While it offers buyers an opportunity to acquire assets they may not afford otherwise, it also carries unique risks. This guide will explain vendor finance, its risks, and strategies to protect both buyers’ and sellers’ interests.

Understanding Vendor Finance: The Basics

In a vendor finance agreement, the seller agrees to fund part or all of the purchase price for a business or property. Rather than securing a bank loan, the buyer makes periodic payments to the seller, typically with interest, over an agreed term. This creates a direct lender-borrower relationship between the buyer and seller.

For buyers, vendor finance offers an alternative route to acquire assets they might not otherwise be able to afford due to a lack of access to conventional bank financing. For sellers, vendor finance can broaden the buyer pool and increase the chances of a successful sale.

How Vendor Finance Typically Works

Here’s how  it usually works:

  • Initial Agreement: The buyer and seller agree on the purchase price and how the payments will be made.
  • Down Payment: The buyer makes an initial payment, which can vary widely depending on the agreement and type of transaction.
  • Documentation: A legal agreement is created to outline loan terms, interest rates, repayment schedules, and security interests.
  • Repayment Period: The buyer repays the loan over a set period, with regular payments to the seller.
  • Final Transfer: Upon full payment, the seller transfers any remaining ownership rights to the buyer.

Types of Vendor Finance Arrangements

Vendor finance isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution; different arrangements are available depending on the nature of the transaction.

For Business Sales

  1. Vendor Take-Back Loans: The seller offers a loan for part of the purchase price, secured by business assets.
  2. Earn-Out Arrangements: Part of the payment may depend on the future success of the business. This means the seller gets paid more if the business performs well.
  3. Seller Financing with Security: The seller retains security interests over business assets until full payment is made.

For Property Transactions

  1. Terms Finance: The buyer makes installment payments while the title remains with the vendor until final payment.
  2. Mortgage-Back Finance: The buyer takes ownership of the property immediately, but the seller retains a mortgage as security.
  3. Rent-to-Buy/Lease Option: The buyer rents the property with an option to purchase it later, with rent contributing to the purchase price.

Each type of arrangement presents different ownership structures, security risks, and repayment terms. The best structure will depend on your individual needs and goals.

The Pros of Vendor Finance

Vendor finance offers several advantages for both buyers and sellers, making it an attractive option in certain circumstances.

For Buyers

  • Easier Access to Financing: Vendor finance may be a more accessible option for buyers who struggle to secure traditional bank loans.
  • Flexible Terms: Buyers can negotiate terms directly with the seller, potentially resulting in more favorable conditions than with a bank loan.
  • Faster Approval: The approval process is typically quicker than with banks, avoiding extensive paperwork and delays.
  • Opportunity to Acquire Valuable Assets: Vendor finance provides a pathway to acquire assets that might otherwise be out of reach.

For Sellers

  • Wider Buyer Pool: Vendor finance attracts more buyers, particularly those who cannot secure traditional financing, increasing the chances of a quick sale.
  • Potential for Higher Sale Prices: By offering financing, sellers can increase demand and, in some cases, receive a premium on the sale price.
  • Ongoing Income Stream: Sellers continue to receive payments over time, creating a potential for passive income.
  • Tax Benefits: Structuring the deal as an installment sale can provide tax advantages for the seller.
  • Better Returns: Compared to other investment vehicles, vendor finance can offer better returns, particularly through interest payments.

The Risks of Vendor Finance You Need to Know

While vendor finance can be beneficial, it also carries inherent risks. Both buyers and sellers must be aware of the potential pitfalls.

Risks for Sellers

  • Buyer Default: If the buyer stops paying, the seller may face challenges recovering the owed amount.
  • Asset Depreciation: The value of the asset may decline under new ownership, leaving the seller with a less valuable security.
  • Delayed Payment: Capital remains tied up during the repayment period, which may affect the seller’s liquidity.
  • Administrative Burden: Managing a vendor finance arrangement requires ongoing documentation and monitoring.
  • Legal Complexity: Enforcing the terms of the agreement and dealing with defaults may require legal intervention, resulting in additional costs.

Risks for Buyers

  • Higher Costs: Vendor finance deals often come with higher interest rates and inflated purchase prices compared to traditional financing.
  • Harsh Default Consequences: Missing a payment could lead to the loss of the asset, along with any previous payments made.
  • Limited Ownership Rights: Full legal ownership might not transfer until the last payment is made.
  • Exploitation: Since vendor finance is less regulated than traditional bank loans, buyers may face unfair terms if not careful.
  • Refinancing Issues: Buyers might struggle to refinance the property or business in the future.

Protecting Sellers

Sellers must take steps to protect their interests when offering vendor finance. Here are essential strategies:

1. Require a Substantial Down Payment

A substantial upfront payment (e.g., 50%) demonstrates the buyer’s commitment and reduces the seller’s risk. This is one of the best ways to protect yourself.

2. Secure the Loan

Sellers should secure their position legally through:

  • Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR): Register security interests over business assets.
  • Real Property Mortgage: Retain a registered mortgage on the property.
  • Personal Guarantees: Obtain guarantees from company directors or major stakeholders.
  • Step-In Rights: Include provisions to take control of the business if the buyer defaults

3. Perform Thorough Due Diligence

Before offering vendor finance, sellers should:

  • Investigate the buyer’s creditworthiness.
  • Assess the buyer’s ability to repay.
  • Review the buyer’s business experience.
  • Examine the personal assets of any guarantors.

4. Draft a Comprehensive Agreement

The vendor finance agreement should cover all critical elements, including:

Element

Description

Loan Amount

Exact amount being financed

Interest Rate

Typically 7-12% annually

Payment Schedule

Frequency and amounts of payments

Term

Usually 1-5 years

Default Provisions

Consequences for missed payments

Security

Collateral securing the loan

Reporting

Requirements for ongoing financial disclosure

5. Plan for Default

Plan for the best, but be prepared if things go off track. Have your enforcement documents in order and keep a close watch on the business’s performance.

Protecting Buyers

Buyers must also take precautions to safeguard their interests:

1. Verify Fair Valuation

Ensure the asset is fairly priced by obtaining an independent valuation and comparing it with similar properties or businesses in the market.

2. Secure Ownership Transfer Rights

Ensure the agreement clearly outlines:

  • When and how the asset’s title will transfer.
  • The buyer’s rights if the seller encounters financial difficulty.
  • Protection against any claims from the seller’s creditors.

3. Negotiate Fair Terms

Push for fair and reasonable terms:

  • Interest rates should be competitive with market rates.
  • Default provisions should be clear and fair.
  • There should be a clear path to full ownership.

4. Seek Professional Advice

Before entering into any vendor finance arrangement, buyers should have:

  • A legal review of all documentation.
  • Accounting advice on tax implications.
  • Financial planning to ensure the loan is manageable.

Balancing Opportunity with Protection

Vendor finance offers both significant opportunities and considerable risks. When structured correctly, it can help facilitate deals that might otherwise be impossible. However, both buyers and sellers must be aware of the risks involved and take steps to protect themselves. Thorough preparation, proper documentation, and ongoing diligence are crucial to a successful vendor finance arrangement.

If you’re considering entering a vendor finance agreement, whether as a buyer or seller, it’s important to seek professional guidance. Our experienced Conveyancing Lawyers Central Coast can help you structure a deal that protects your interests and ensures a smooth transaction. Contact us today for a consultation on how we can assist you with your vendor finance needs.

 

man talking to a lawyer about a section 14 application

Section 14 Mental Health Applications: Who Qualifies and How to Apply in NSW Courts

By Criminal Law

In 2022, the AIHW reported that 51% of individuals entering prisons had mental health conditions at some point in their lives. Moreover, estimates show that 15-30% of people in custody have intellectual or cognitive impairments, according to the Office of the Inspector of Custodial Services.  Recognising these conditions, Section 14 of the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW) [‘the Act’] offers a pathway to divert individuals from punishment to treatment. When successful, a Section 14 application allows a defendant to avoid a conviction while entering a mental health treatment plan. 

This article outlines the key aspects of Section 14 applications, including eligibility criteria, the application process, and treatment requirements.

What is a Section 14 Application?

A Section 14 application allows the court to dismiss charges for individuals with mental health or cognitive impairments:

  • without any conditions; or
  • They may be placed under the care of a responsible person; or
  • They commit themselves to assessment and treatment of their condition.

However, an order to dismiss a charge under these provisions does not mean a conviction.

The Purpose of Section 14

This legislation serves several important purposes:

  • Recognising the role of mental health: It acknowledges that punishing someone for behaviour influenced by a mental health condition may not serve justice or society’s interests.
  • Providing access to treatment: Defendants receive the mental health care they need while still being held accountable.
  • Reducing reoffending: Addressing the root causes of criminal behaviour through treatment lowers the risk of future offending.

Considerations for the Magistrate in Making a Decision

When making a Section 14 order, a Magistrate may consider:

  • The nature of the defendant’s mental health or cognitive impairment.
  • The seriousness and circumstances of the alleged offence.
  • The available sentencing options if the defendant is found guilty.
  • Any changes in the defendant’s circumstances since the offence occurred.
  • The defendant’s criminal history.
  • Whether the defendant has been subject to a similar order before.
  • Whether a treatment or support plan is in place for the defendant.
  • The potential risk to the safety of the defendant, victims, or the public.
  • Any other relevant factors.

Eligibility: Who Can Apply?

To qualify for a Section 14 order, a defendant must demonstrate they have a:

  • mental health impairment;
  • cognitive impairment; or
  • both.

These terms have specific legal definitions under the Act.

Mental Health Impairment Requirements

A person must show they experience a significant disturbance that affects their daily functioning. This may manifest as:

  • Disordered thinking
  • Severe mood disturbances
  • Problems with decision-making
  • Distorted perceptions of reality
  • Memory issues

Importantly, this disturbance must be clinically diagnosed and significantly impact how the person manages their emotions, makes decisions, or behaves.

For example, a person with schizophrenia experiencing delusions may misinterpret situations and act irrationally, while someone with major depression may lack the mental clarity to make sound decisions.

Cognitive Impairment Criteria

Cognitive impairment refers to persistent difficulties with fundamental mental functions, such as:

  • Understanding information
  • Reasoning and problem-solving
  • Learning and memory
  • Decision-making and impulse control

According to Section 5 of the Act, these cognitive impairments may be caused by:

  • Intellectual disability
  • Borderline intellectual functioning
  • Dementia
  • Acquired brain injury
  • Drug or alcohol-related brain damage, including foetal alcohol spectrum disorder
  • Autism spectrum disorder.

To illustrate, a person with an intellectual disability may struggle to comprehend the consequences of their actions, while an individual with a traumatic brain injury may exhibit impulsive behaviour.

The Application Process: A Step-by-Step Guide

Making a Section 14 application requires careful preparation and strong evidence. The court applies a two-limb test when assessing applications.

The First Limb – Establishing Eligibility

The court must be satisfied that the defendant has a qualifying condition. This typically requires expert medical evidence, such as a psychiatrist’s or psychologist’s report detailing:

  • The nature and severity of the impairment
  • How it affects the person’s behaviour and decision-making
  • The link between the impairment and the alleged offence
  • Available treatment options and their effectiveness
  • The person’s willingness to engage in treatment

The Second Limb – Proving Appropriateness

Even if the defendant qualifies, the court must consider whether diversion into treatment is more appropriate than proceeding with prosecution. This involves assessing:

  • The seriousness of the offence: More severe offences may be less likely to qualify.
  • The defendant’s criminal history: Previous offences and compliance with past court orders are considered.
  • The quality of the proposed treatment plan: The court needs assurance that the plan is comprehensive and practical.
  • Community safety concerns: The risk of reoffending and harm to others is a crucial factor.
  • The likelihood of successful rehabilitation: The court assesses whether treatment will reduce the chances of future offending.

A well-prepared Section 14 application should address all these factors to maximise the chances of success. Our Criminal Lawyers Central Coast will ensure all requirements are met.

Treatment Plans and Court Monitoring

A successful Section 14 application requires a structured treatment plan. The plan should include:

Comprehensive Treatment Framework

  • Regular appointments with mental health professionals
  • Evidence-based therapeutic interventions
  • Medication management where required
  • Support services for housing, substance use, or employment
  • Clear goals and measurable progress indicators

Court Monitoring and Compliance

The court retains oversight for up to 12 months, during which:

  • Treatment providers submit progress reports
  • Any breaches must be reported
  • The defendant must show ongoing commitment to treatment
  • The court may review the plan to ensure continued suitability

Breach of a Section 14 Order

If a defendant fails to comply with their treatment plan, the court may take several actions:

Immediate Consequences

  • Requiring the person to appear in court to explain the breach
  • Issuing an arrest warrant for non-compliance
  • Modifying the treatment plan to improve compliance

Serious Breaches

If a person repeatedly breaches their Section 14 order, the court may:

  • Revoke the order
  • Reinstate the original criminal charges
  • Proceed with prosecution, potentially resulting in a conviction and penalties

This highlights the importance of adherence to the treatment plan and maintaining regular engagement with mental health professionals.

The Evolution from Section 32

Section 14 replaced the previous Section 32 of the now-repealed Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW). This change brought key improvements:

Longer Monitoring Period

  • Extended from 6 to 12 months
  • Greater oversight of treatment compliance
  • More time for meaningful rehabilitation

Clearer Criteria

  • More structured definitions of mental health and cognitive impairments
  • Improved guidance for magistrates
  • Enhanced emphasis on community safety

These updates have made Section 14 applications more structured and effective in balancing public safety with the needs of individuals with impairments.

Final Thoughts

Section 14 of the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW) represents a compassionate and effective approach to handling mental health issues in the criminal justice system. It allows eligible individuals to focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment, ultimately benefiting both the person and society.

However, navigating a Section 14 application requires legal expertise and thorough preparation. At Felicio Law Firm, our experienced Central Coast Criminal Lawyers provide:

  • Comprehensive eligibility assessments
  • Access to qualified mental health professionals
  • Expert application preparation and strong court advocacy
  • Ongoing support throughout the legal process

If you or a loved one is considering making a Section 14 application, contact us immediately to ensure the best possible outcome.

Buying a Liquor Shop in New South Wales

Buying a Liquor Shop in New South Wales? Here’s What You Need to Know

By Business Law, Conveyancing

Buying a liquor shop in New South Wales (NSW) is a significant undertaking, and it’s essential to approach the process with a clear understanding of the legal, financial, and operational requirements. The liquor retail industry is highly regulated, with strict laws governing everything from licence transfers to staff management and business operations. Failure to comply with these regulations can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to $11,000 for breaches of liquor licensing laws.

Whether you’re an experienced business owner looking to expand or a newcomer to the retail sector, this guide provides valuable insights into the essential steps involved in purchasing a liquor shop in NSW.

Licence Transfer Process

One of the first and most critical steps in buying a liquor shop is ensuring that the liquor licence is successfully transferred to you. This process can be complicated, and there are specific steps you must follow to comply with the law. Depending on the situation, you may need to transfer the licence either with or without the consent of the current licensee.

With Consent Transfer

This is the more common method of transferring a liquor licence when buying a liquor shop. The process involves obtaining written permission from the outgoing licensee and submitting an application to the NSW Liquor & Gaming. Here’s what you need to know:

  • Written Permission: You’ll need written consent from the current licensee for the transfer to proceed.
  • Discounted Submission: If you submit the transfer application online, you’ll receive a 10% discount on the associated fees.
  • Documentation Requirements: You will need to complete and submit two important forms: the TDEC1 (existing licensee declaration) and TDEC2 (proposed licensee declaration).
  • Approval Timeline: Once submitted, provisional approval is typically granted within four weeks, with final confirmation expected within 60 days.

Without Consent Transfer

In some situations, you may have to proceed with a transfer without the outgoing licensee’s consent, such as when the business owner has failed to comply with their obligations or when there is a dispute. This approach is somewhat more complex and requires:

  • Notification: You must notify the outgoing licensee via registered post or email about your intention to transfer the licence.
  • Evidence of Ownership: To proceed, you’ll need to provide evidence that you either own or lease the premises, such as a lease agreement, rates notice, or title documents.
  • Additional Declaration: A TDEC3 form (owner in possession declaration) must also be completed.

In both cases, it’s advisable to consult with a legal professional to guide you through the process and ensure all legal requirements are met.

Documentation Requirements

Transferring a liquor licence entails considerable documentation. To facilitate the process, you’ll need to prepare various documents, including:

  • Current RSA Qualifications: All staff members involved in the sale of alcohol must hold a Responsible Service of Alcohol (RSA)
  • NSW National Police Certificate: You must provide a police certificate for all individuals applying for the licence. The certificate must be dated within three months of submission.
  • ASIC Extract for Corporate Licensees: If you’re purchasing the liquor shop as a company, you’ll need to provide an Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) extract for the corporate licensee.
  • Gaming Machine Forms: If the liquor shop includes gaming machines, you’ll need to submit direct debit and monitoring forms.
  • Completed Declaration Forms: Depending on the type of transfer, you’ll need to provide the appropriate declaration forms to confirm your eligibility to hold a liquor licence.
  • Proof of Ownership or Lease Rights: You must demonstrate that you have legal rights to occupy the premises, either through ownership or a lease agreement.

Business Continuity

An advantage of the current licensing system is that you can continue operating the business under provisional approval while the final transfer of the liquor licence is processed. However, this requires that you:

  • Submit a Complete Application: Ensure your application for the liquor licence transfer is thorough and complete to avoid delays.
  • Meet Eligibility Criteria: You must meet all eligibility criteria set out by the NSW Liquor & Gaming, such as having the necessary qualifications and financial standing.
  • Payment of Fees: Ensure that all applicable fees are paid promptly to avoid delays in processing your application.
  • Notification to Relevant Parties: You’ll need to notify various parties, including the outgoing licensee and local authorities, to ensure transparency and compliance.

Operational Requirements

Once the licence transfer is complete, you’ll need to operate your liquor shop in compliance with a range of legal requirements. The ongoing operational requirements are stringent, and failure to meet these obligations could result in penalties or even loss of licence.

Staff Management

One of the primary operational obligations when buying a liquor shop is ensuring that your staff are properly trained and compliant with all regulations:

  • Age Requirements: All staff involved in the sale or supply of alcohol must be at least 18 years old.
  • RSA Certification: Every employee must hold a valid Responsible Service of Alcohol (RSA) certificate.
  • Age Verification: Your staff must implement age verification processes for customers purchasing alcohol, including checking IDs when necessary.
  • Training in Intoxication Assessment: Staff must be trained to assess intoxication levels and refuse service to individuals who are drunk.
  • Clear Refusal of Service Policies: You must have a well-documented and clear policy in place for refusing service to intoxicated customers.

Compliance Systems

Maintaining compliance with the law requires implementing a range of systems and processes in your liquor shop:

  • Age Verification: This should apply to both in-store and online sales, ensuring that no underage individuals can purchase alcohol.
  • CCTV Monitoring: You will need to install a CCTV system to monitor premises for security and compliance purposes.
  • Incident Reporting: A formal incident reporting procedure should be in place to document any breaches of liquor laws or disputes with customers.
  • Stock Management: Proper stock management and labelling are essential to comply with consumer protection laws.
  • Trading Hours Monitoring: Ensure that your business operates within the allowed trading hours for liquor sales, as specified by the licence.
  • Delivery Protocols: If you offer home delivery of alcohol, ensure that all relevant protocols for safe and legal delivery are in place.

Contract Protections

When buying a liquor shop, your purchase contract should include a number of protections to ensure that you are fully informed and protected throughout the transaction:

Essential Warranties

These warranties should cover the following areas:

  • Licence Compliance: The current licensee should guarantee that the liquor licence is in good standing, without any legal issues or breaches.
  • Staff Qualifications: The vendor must provide verification that all staff meet the RSA requirements.
  • Trading History: The vendor should provide accurate and complete information about the trading history of the business.
  • Stock Valuation: A formal stock valuation should be included to avoid disputes later.
  • Equipment Ownership: Ensure that the equipment in the business is owned outright or appropriately leased.
  • Absence of Penalties: There should be a warranty that there are no undisclosed penalties or legal actions against the business.

Additional Protections

In addition to the essential warranties, your contract should also address other protections, such as:

  • Non-Competition Clauses: Prevent the seller from opening a competing business nearby.
  • Training Period: Negotiate a training period to ensure a smooth transition and retention of key staff.
  • Supplier Relationship Transfers: Ensure that any key supplier relationships are transferred or protected.
  • Social Media and Online Presence: Ensure that the vendor transfers ownership of any relevant online assets, such as social media accounts and website domains.

Risk Management Strategies

Effective risk management is essential to running a successful liquor shop. Some strategies include:

Legal Compliance

  • Regular Licence Reviews: Continuously review your liquor licence conditions to ensure compliance.
  • Staff Tracking Systems: Maintain a system to track staff certifications and renewals.
  • Incident Documentation: Ensure incidents are thoroughly documented for legal and insurance purposes.

Business Protection

  • Insurance Coverage: Review your insurance coverage to protect against potential risks such as theft, fire, or liability claims.
  • Security Systems: Regularly assess and update your security systems to protect both staff and stock.
  • Local Area Management: Understand local area regulations and community concerns to maintain good relations and avoid potential conflicts.

Financial Considerations

When buying a liquor shop, it’s important to evaluate the financial aspects carefully:

Purchase Price Components

  • Assets: This includes physical assets at book value and the stock at an agreed valuation.
  • Goodwill: This is calculated based on factors like location, trading history, customer base, and the business’s compliance record.
  • Licence Transfer Costs: Factor in the costs associated with transferring the liquor licence.

Ongoing Operational Costs

  • Staff Training: Regular training and certification costs are an ongoing expense.
  • Security Maintenance: Ongoing security system costs are important for protecting your business.
  • Compliance: Ensure you budget for the cost of ongoing compliance with regulatory requirements.

Conclusion

Buying a liquor shop in NSW involves more than just financial investment—it requires careful attention to legal, operational, and compliance factors. Thorough due diligence, structuring a solid purchase agreement, and ensuring your business is compliant with all regulations are key to success. Seeking expert legal advice throughout the process can help protect your investment and ensure smooth operation.

We Offer Expert Legal Help

Our team of experienced Business and Conveyancing Lawyers Central Coast can help you navigate the complexities of buying a liquor shop. We can assist with:

  • Preparing and submitting licence transfer applications
  • Completing required declaration forms
  • Ensuring all documentation meets regulatory requirements
  • Negotiating with current licensees or premises owners
  • Structuring the purchase to protect your interests
  • Establishing compliance systems for ongoing operations

Maximise your investment’s security with professional support. Contact us today!

Must-Know Methods for Valuing a Business in Family Law Matters

Must-Know Methods for Valuing a Business in Family Law Matters

By Family Law

When a relationship breaks down, one of the most complex and high-stakes aspects of a property settlement can be valuing a business. With around 70% of Australia’s more than 2.66 million businesses being family-owned, these assets often play a pivotal role in the division of property.

This guide will break down the key methods of business valuation, explain why it’s so important, and provide practical insights for navigating this complex process in family law matters.

The Importance of Proper Business Valuations

Accurate business valuations are essential in family law cases because businesses often make up the largest portion of the assets to be divided. The Family Court’s job is to ensure a fair distribution of assets, taking into account both direct and indirect contributions from each party.

In the case Turnbull v Turnbull (1991) FLC 92-258, the Court established guidelines for valuing both direct management contributions and indirect inputs. It ruled that shares in private family companies should be valued based on their worth to the actual owner, rather than what a potential buyer might pay.

These principles were expanded in Scott & Scott (2006) FamCA 1379, where the Court highlighted that valuations should include benefits unique to the owner, such as personal goodwill. Goodwill refers to the intangible value a business holds, such as its reputation, customer relationships, or the owner’s personal connections that contribute to its ongoing success. Personal goodwill, in particular, is tied to the business owner’s skills and reputation, which aren’t captured by traditional market value.

These cases highlight the importance of carefully considering both the tangible and intangible aspects of a business when determining its value in family law proceedings, ensuring a just and equitable division of assets.

Common Methods of Business Valuation

Future Maintainable Earnings (FME) Method

The FME method, often called the income method, assesses the future earning potential of a business. Valuers examine:

  • Regular Earnings: The business’s normal income is analysed by removing unusual one-off payments (such as insurance payouts) to determine consistent yearly earnings.
  • Capitalisation Rate: A risk factor, or ‘cap rate,’ is applied based on income stability. For example, a doctor’s practice with a 20-year history may have a lower cap rate of 2-3, while a new retail shop might have a higher rate of 4-5 due to higher risk.
  • Business Strengths: Special features of the business, such as a prime location, valuable contracts, or unique equipment, are evaluated.
  • Future Challenges: Potential factors that could impact future profits, such as new laws or technological advancements, are considered.

Asset-Based Valuation Method

This method calculates the value by summing all assets owned by the business and subtracting liabilities:

  • Physical Items: Property, equipment, and stock are valued at current prices, rather than their original purchase cost.
  • Intellectual Property: Intangible assets, such as trademarks, recipes, or exclusive selling rights, are included.
  • Working Capital: Stock values, outstanding customer payments, and cash reserves are assessed.
  • Liabilities: All debts, including loans, staff entitlements, and anticipated tax bills, are subtracted.

Market Comparison Method

Also known as the Market-Based Approach, this method compares the business to similar ones recently sold:

  • Industry Standards: Sales of comparable businesses are reviewed, with adjustments made for differences in size and quality.
  • Revenue Multipliers: Differences in profitability among businesses with similar sales are considered.
  • Location Impact: The effect of location on value is factored in, such as the difference between a shop on a busy main street and one in a quiet suburb.
  • Market Timing: The impact of market changes since other businesses were sold is taken into account.

Professional Requirements

Expert Qualifications

Professional valuers must demonstrate:

  • Relevant professional certifications such as Chartered Accountant or Certified Practicing Valuer qualifications that establish technical competency.
  • Specific industry expertise demonstrated through prior experience valuing similar businesses in the sector.
  • Independence from both parties, including no prior business or personal relationships that could suggest bias.
  • Current knowledge of relevant Family Court decisions affecting business valuations.play tirnaga game

Documentation Standards

Essential business records include:

  • Three years of detailed financial statements showing operational trends and seasonal patterns.
  • Tax returns and Business Activity Statements demonstrating compliance and reported income.
  • Employee records including contracts, entitlements, and key person dependencies.
  • Asset registers with purchase dates, depreciation schedules, and maintenance records.

Special Considerations

Family Business Factors

Important considerations include:

  • Unpaid family work contributions such as after-hours bookkeeping or weekend assistance during peak periods.
  • Personal guarantees provided by family members for business loans or leases that affect risk assessment.
  • Business relationships that may be impacted by family separation, such as key customers with personal loyalties.
  • Succession planning implications, particularly where children are involved in the business.

Conclusion

Business valuations in family law matters require careful consideration of multiple factors and methodologies. The process demands expertise in accounting, finance, and legal requirements while considering the unique aspects of family businesses and the “value to owner” principle established by Australian courts.

Our Family Lawyers Can Help

At Felicio Law Firm, our experienced Family Lawyers Central Coast understand the complexities of business valuations and can guide you through the process. We work closely with qualified valuers and financial experts to ensure your business interests are properly assessed and represented in your property settlement. Whether you need assistance with initial valuations, negotiations, or court proceedings, we provide comprehensive support to protect your interests and achieve fair outcomes. Reach out today to explore how we can safeguard your business interests and provide expert guidance through your family law journey.

The Kemp v Findlay Case: A Wake-Up Call for Estate Planning

The Kemp v Findlay Case: A Wake-Up Call for Estate Planning

By Estate Planning

In July 2023, a tragic boating accident off Sydney Harbour claimed the life of Andrew Findlay, a successful 50-year-old technology entrepreneur. What followed was not just a time of mourning for his family, but the beginning of a complex legal battle over his $13.5 million estate. The high-profile case of Kemp v Findlay [2024] NSWSC 902 serves as a stark reminder of the critical importance of professional Will preparation and the potential pitfalls of informal or do-it-yourself (DIY) Wills, as this article explains.

If you are considering writing a Will or updating your existing Will, consult with our expert Wills and Estate Planning Lawyers to ensure your wishes are honoured.

The Heart of the Dispute

At the centre of the legal storm were two conflicting documents: a formally executed Will from 2015 and an informal, electronic document created in 2019. The initial Will bequeathed Findlay’s entire estate to his ex-partner, Elizabeth Kemp, while the revised document designated his three young children as beneficiaries.

The crux of the matter was that the 2019 document, despite clearly expressing Findlay’s updated wishes, had never been formally executed. It remained an unsigned Microsoft Word file on his computer. This oversight set the stage for a protracted legal battle that would ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The Court’s Decision

In a landmark ruling, Justice Kelly Rees determined that the 2019 electronic document should be accepted as Findlay’s last valid Will, despite its lack of formal execution. The court was satisfied that Findlay had intended the document to operate as his Will without further formalities.

Key factors in this decision included:

  • Findlay’s clear communication about the new Will to his cousin (the new executor) via email.
  • His statement to his family law solicitor about changing his Will.
  • The detailed nature of the 2019 document, which included specific changes to beneficiaries and executors.

Whilst this outcome aligned with Findlay’s apparent intentions, the case highlights the risks and uncertainties associated with informal Wills.

Lessons from Kemp v Findlay

This case offers several crucial lessons for anyone considering their estate planning:

  • Regular Will Reviews: Life changes such as separation, divorce, or the birth of children should prompt a review of your Will.
  • Clear Communication: Whilst the court considered Findlay’s communications about his new Will, relying on such evidence is risky. It’s far better to have a properly executed Will that clearly documents your wishes.
  • Formal Execution Matters: Although the court accepted Findlay’s informal Will, this outcome is not guaranteed. Proper execution provides much greater certainty.
  • Complexity Requires Professional Advice: Findlay’s situation, involving a high-value estate and young children, warranted professional legal guidance.

The Pitfalls of DIY Wills

Albeit DIY will kits and online will-making tools may seem convenient and cost-effective, they come with significant risks:

  • Improper Execution: As seen in Findlay’s case, failing to properly sign and witness a Will can lead to lengthy and expensive legal disputes.
  • Unclear Language: Legal terminology is precise, and DIY Wills often contain ambiguities that can lead to misinterpretation or challenges.
  • Failure to Consider All Assets: DIY Wills may not properly account for all assets, especially complex ones like superannuation or business interests.
  • Lack of Tailored Advice: Every person’s situation is unique, and DIY solutions can’t provide the personalised advice needed to address individual circumstances.
  • Inability to Anticipate Challenges: An experienced lawyer can help structure your estate plan to minimise the risk of challenges or disputes.

The Importance of Professional Will Preparation

Engaging an experienced Wills and Estate Planning Lawyer offers numerous benefits:

  • Legal Expertise: A Wills and Estate Planning Lawyer, such as ours ensures your Will complies with all legal requirements and uses precise language to clearly express your intentions.
  • Comprehensive Planning: Professional advice considers your entire financial picture, including assets that may not form part of your estate, like superannuation.
  • Tax Efficiency: A lawyer can advise on structuring your estate in a tax-effective manner, potentially saving your beneficiaries significant sums.
  • Protection Against Challenges: Professional Wills are less likely to be successfully challenged, providing greater security for your intended beneficiaries.
  • Regular Reviews: Many lawyers offer regular will review services to ensure your Will remains up-to-date and reflective of your current circumstances.
  • Peace of Mind: Knowing your affairs are in order and your loved ones will be provided for can provide immeasurable peace of mind.

The Complexities of Modern Estate Planning

The Kemp v Findlay case also highlights the increasing complexities of modern estate planning. In today’s digital age, with blended families becoming more common and assets often spread across multiple jurisdictions, estate planning requires a nuanced and comprehensive approach.

Digital Assets: A New Frontier

One aspect not directly addressed in the Findlay case, but increasingly relevant, is the management of digital assets. These can include everything from social media accounts and email to cryptocurrency and online businesses. Many people overlook these assets when creating their Wills, but they can have significant sentimental or financial value.

A professional estate planner can help you inventory your digital assets and create a plan for their management or distribution after your death.

Cross-Border Considerations

In our globalised world, it’s not uncommon for individuals to have assets in multiple countries or beneficiaries living overseas. This can create complex legal and tax issues that require specialist knowledge. Professional advice can help navigate these international complexities, potentially involving the creation of multiple wills to cover assets in different countries.

Superannuation: Often Misunderstood

Superannuation is often one of the largest assets people have, yet many don’t realise that it doesn’t automatically form part of their estate. A professional estate planner can help you understand your superannuation arrangements and ensure that your superannuation benefits are distributed according to your wishes.

Blended Families: Balancing Competing Interests

Blended families present unique challenges in estate planning. Balancing the needs and expectations of current partners, ex-partners, and children from different relationships can be extremely complex. Professional advice is crucial in these situations, potentially involving strategies like testamentary trusts or mutual wills.

Business Succession Planning

For business owners like Findlay, estate planning isn’t just about personal assets but also about ensuring smooth business succession. A professionally prepared will can be coordinated with other business succession tools to ensure a smooth transition of business interests after death.

Testamentary Trusts: Advanced Estate Planning

Testamentary trusts can offer significant benefits in terms of asset protection and tax efficiency for beneficiaries. They can be particularly useful for protecting inheritances for vulnerable beneficiaries or providing tax advantages. However, setting up effective testamentary trusts requires careful planning and drafting.

Capacity and Undue Influence

Questions of testamentary capacity and undue influence often arise in Will disputes, particularly those involving informal Wills. When a Will is prepared by a solicitor, they typically assess and document the testator’s capacity, providing valuable evidence if the will is later challenged.

The Role of Executors

Choosing an appropriate executor is a crucial part of the estate planning process. Seeking professional advice can clarify the duties of an executor and assist you in selecting the most suitable individual for the position.

Advanced Healthcare Directives and Powers of Attorney

Comprehensive estate planning goes beyond just preparing for what happens after death. It also involves planning for potential incapacity during your lifetime through documents like advanced healthcare directives and powers of attorney.

How Felicio Law Firm Can Help

Felicio Law Firm specialises in comprehensive estate planning. Our experienced team can:

  • Draft a legally sound Will that clearly expresses your wishes.
  • Advise on complex issues such as blended families, business succession, and international assets.
  • Help you understand and make provisions for assets not covered by your Will, such as superannuation.
  • Assist with related documents like powers of attorney and advance care directives.
  • Provide regular Will reviews to ensure your estate plan remains current.
  • Offer executor support services to assist your chosen executor in administering your estate.

Conclusion

Whilst the Kemp v Findlay case shows that courts may sometimes accept informal Wills, it also demonstrates the stress, cost, and uncertainty that can result from not having a properly executed Will. The small investment in professional Will preparation can save your estate significant costs and your loved ones considerable stress in the long run.

Don’t leave your legacy to chance. Contact our friendly Wills and Estate Planning Lawyers at Felicio Law Firm today to ensure your final wishes are clearly documented and legally enforceable. We will help you navigate the complexities of modern estate planning and protect what matters most.

Employee terminated via email

Can Employees be Terminated via a Phone Call, SMS, or Email? Understanding the Legal Consequences in Australia

By Business Law

Workplace communication has undergone significant transformation. With smartphones and remote work becoming the norm, many employers are tempted to utilise electronic methods like phone calls, SMS, or email to convey critical information, including employee dismissals. However, recent rulings by the Fair Work Commission (FWC) have brought to light the potential risks tied to using these channels for termination. This article considers the legal framework surrounding electronic dismissals in Australia, reviews pertinent case law, and offers guidance for employers navigating this intricate issue.

The Legal Framework

While Australian Fair Work legislation does not explicitly forbid dismissals communicated through electronic means, the Fair Work Act 2009 and the National Employment Standards establish essential requirements for terminating employment, such as notice periods and payment entitlements. These standards are applicable regardless of how the dismissal is communicated.

Additionally, the Fair Work Act mandates that dismissals should not be harsh, unjust, or unreasonable, which is especially relevant when evaluating how the dismissal is communicated. Several factors are considered in determining whether a dismissal is unfair, including:

  • The validity of the dismissal reason
  • Whether the employee was informed of this reason
  • The chance provided to the employee to give their response
  • Any unreasonable refusal by the employer to allow a support person during dismissal discussions

While these factors do not specifically address communication methods, recent FWC rulings have generally discouraged electronic dismissals.

Recent Case Law

Recent decisions by the FWC have clarified the inappropriateness of terminating employees via electronic means. These rulings consistently indicate that dismissals conveyed through these channels are generally unsuitable and may lead to findings of unfair dismissal.

Kurt Wallace v AFS Security 24/7 Pty Ltd (2019)

In this case, Commissioner Cambridge sharply criticised the use of SMS for dismissing employees. The ruling stated that dismissals should not be communicated through SMS or other electronic means. Unless there are genuine concerns about physical safety or logistical barriers, dismissals should be delivered in person. Failing to do so is deemed unnecessarily insensitive. The significance of terminating employment necessitates face-to-face communication, with provisions for a support person and formal documentation.

The Commissioner noted that dismissing someone via SMS displayed a fundamental disregard for human dignity and tarnished the reputation of those involved.

Van-Son Thai v Email Ventilation Pty Ltd (2019)

In Van-Son Thai v Email Ventilation Pty Ltd, Deputy President Sams reiterated the unsuitability of electronic dismissals, asserting that informing an employee of their termination via phone, SMS, or email is an inappropriate method for communicating such a consequential decision. He suggested that dismissals should primarily occur face-to-face, with exceptions only in cases of genuine safety concerns or when an employee explicitly requests not to meet in person.

Ms Anita Cachia v Scobel Pty Ltd ATF the S & I Trust t/a Emerse Skin & Laser (2018)

This case involved a small business that dismissed an employee over the phone following an investigation into misconduct. Although the FWC ultimately deemed the dismissal justified, Deputy President Sams criticised the method of communication, stating that informing an employee of their termination through a phone call, SMS, or email is inappropriate given the serious implications for the employee. Furthermore, he emphasised that even if an employee’s behaviour has been problematic, the communication method remains critically important.

Implications for Employers

These cases make it clear that the FWC views electronic dismissals unfavourably. Even when the reasons for dismissal are valid and procedures are correctly followed, using electronic means can lead to findings of unfair dismissal.

Key implications for employers include:

  • Prefer face-to-face communication: Whenever feasible, dismissals should be conducted in person. This fosters a more dignified and respectful process, allowing the employee to have a support person present.
  • Limited exceptions: The FWC has suggested that electronic dismissals might be permissible only in rare situations, such as genuine safety fears or significant geographical barriers.
  • Document the process: Employers should maintain detailed records of all communications and decisions regarding the dismissal, regardless of the communication method.
  • Explore alternatives: If in-person meetings are unfeasible due to safety or distance, consider video conferencing as a more personal option than phone calls, SMS, or emails.
  • Provide written follow-up: Even when dismissals are communicated in person, employers should send a written confirmation detailing the decision and any relevant information.

Best Practices for Employers

To mitigate the risk of unfair dismissal claims linked to communication methods, employers should adopt the following best practices:

  • Create clear policies: Develop and communicate explicit policies regarding dismissal procedures, highlighting the importance of in-person communication.
  • Train managers: Ensure all managers and supervisors are well-trained in proper dismissal protocols, particularly the significance of face-to-face communication.
  • Plan ahead: When preparing for a dismissal, arrange the logistics for how and where the conversation will take place, aiming for a private, in-person meeting whenever possible.
  • Offer support: Allow the employee the opportunity to have a support person present during dismissal discussions.
  • Be prepared: Before the dismissal meeting, prepare a script or key points to ensure all essential information is conveyed clearly and compassionately.
  • Provide written confirmation: After the in-person meeting, send the employee a letter confirming the dismissal and outlining any relevant details or entitlements.
  • Consider alternatives: If in-person communication is genuinely impossible, explore video conferencing as a more personal option compared to phone calls, SMS, or emails.
  • Document everything: Keep meticulous records of the dismissal process, including reasons for the decision, investigations conducted, and all communications with the employee.

Conclusion

While technology has made workplace communication easier, the human element remains crucial during employee dismissals. Recent Fair Work Commission (FWC) rulings emphasise that employers must treat employees with dignity and respect, especially in termination situations. Prioritising face-to-face communication and following best practices can help reduce the risk of unfair dismissal claims and promote a respectful workplace culture.

At Felicio Law Firm, our experienced Business Lawyers are here to guide you through the complexities of employee dismissals, ensuring that your dismissal processes are compliant with current regulations. We’ll help you minimise risks while upholding the rights and dignity of your employees. Contact us today for expert legal advice tailored to your business needs. 

How to Protect Your Estate from Future Dependency Claims by Grandchildren

How to Protect Your Estate from Future Dependency Claims by Grandchildren

By Estate Planning

Legal claims on grandparents’ estates are expected to rise dramatically. Contact our expert wills and estate legal professionals to protect the future of your estate.

Grandparents’ roles have evolved over the years and can sometimes involve financial support or care for their grandchildren. Although this can strengthen bonds, unexpected legal challenges in estate planning may arise in the future. Specifically, grandchildren may contest a grandparent’s will through a family provision claim as observed in Curtis vs Curtis [2023] NSWSC 1164.

Background and Implications of Curtis vs Curtis

The grandchildren of Mr Barry Curtis (the deceased) made claims on his estate on the grounds of dependency based on the Succession Act 2006. In his will, the deceased named his son, Rodney Curtis (the grandchildren’s uncle), as the sole beneficiary. The judge ruled that the grandchildren were indeed partly dependent on the deceased. Consequently, the judge made provisions for the grandchildren’s eligibility to receive 20% of the sale of the deceased’s property.

This case illustrates several important aspects of family provision claims by grandchildren in NSW:

  • Grandchildren can be eligible to make a claim if they can demonstrate dependency;
  • The court will consider factors beyond just financial dependency;
  • The needs of other beneficiaries (in this case, the son) are also taken into account; and
  • The court has discretion in determining what constitutes “adequate” provision.

Dependency Under Family Provision Claims

In most states, grandchildren can contest wills if they can prove that, at some point, they were financially dependent on their grandparents. However, in NSW, these family provision claims may find support from certain conditions of section 59 of the Succession Act.

Key provisions related to grandchildren’s claims of dependency in NSW

  1. Eligibility: Grandchildren must demonstrate that they were dependent on their deceased grandparent at the time of their death or at some earlier time.
  2. Dependency Requirement: Partial or full reliance on the deceased at any one time for their upbringing, education, or career growth. Nonetheless, dependency extends beyond financial matters and includes emotional or physical support.
  3. Nature of the Claim: The treatment for grandchildren is similar to those for other eligible applicants, such as children or spouses. However, the grandchildren must establish their need for provision from the deceased’s estate based on factors such as:
  • financial circumstances
  • the size of the estate
  • their relationship with the deceased.
  1. Consideration of Other Beneficiaries: The court will consider the claims of all potential beneficiaries. It will also determine if there is adequate provision for the proper maintenance, education, or advancement in life of the grandchild.
  2. Time Limit: Within 12 months of the deceased’s death, unless the court grants an extension of time.

Strategies for Protecting Estate Your Estate from Future Dependency Claims

Seek Professional Advice

Protecting your estate from potential dependency claims by grandchildren requires a multifaceted approach. Given the complexity of estate law and its variations across states, consulting experienced estate planning lawyers such as ours is vital to protecting your estate from future claims.

Have a Clear and Detailed Will Drafting

The foundation of protecting your estate lies in a well-drafted will:

  • Explicit statements: Clearly state your intentions regarding each potential beneficiary, including grandchildren. If you’re excluding someone, explain why.
  • Detailed asset allocation: Provide a clear breakdown of how your assets should be distributed.
  • Use of a “no-contest” clause: While not enforceable in all jurisdictions, this clause can discourage frivolous claims.
  • Regular updates: Review and update your will regularly, especially after significant life events or changes in family dynamics.

Consider using Trusts

Trusts can be powerful tools in estate planning, offering both flexibility and protection:

  • Discretionary trusts allow trustees to determine how and when to distribute assets, potentially reducing the grounds for a dependency claim.
  • Testamentary trusts are created upon your death, and can provide ongoing support to beneficiaries while maintaining control over asset distribution.
  • Special purpose trusts can be set up for specific purposes, such as education or healthcare, potentially satisfying moral obligations without creating dependency.

Our team of estate planning lawyers may guide you in determining which trust is best for you if you are considering this option.

Maintain Clear Records

Thorough documentation can be crucial in defending against future claims:

  • Financial records: Keep detailed records of any financial support provided to grandchildren.
  • Communication records: Document discussions about estate planning with family members.
  • Reasons for decisions: Record your reasoning behind estate planning decisions, especially if you’re treating beneficiaries unequally.

Review and Updates your Will

  • Estate planning is not a one-time event. Review your estate plan annually or after major life events like births, deaths, marriages, or divorces in the family.

Address Potential Dependency During Your Lifetime

Take steps to reduce the likelihood of dependency claims:

  • Encourage financial independence: Support grandchildren in developing skills and careers that lead to financial independence.
  • Set clear expectations: Communicate clearly about any support you provide and its limitations.
  • Gradual reduction of support: If you’ve been providing significant support, consider gradually reducing it over time.

Family Agreements

Consider formalising family arrangements:

  • Financial agreements: Document any financial support provided to grandchildren, clearly stating the terms and duration.
  • Family provision agreements: In some jurisdictions, you can create legally binding agreements that limit future claims.

Mediation and Communication

  • Open communication about your estate plans during family meetings can prevent misunderstandings and potential disputes. If conflicts arise, consult a lawyer before they escalate to legal claims.

Need more information? Consult our empathic team

The dynamics of modern families are changing, including the roles grandparents have on their grandchildren’s lives. Navigating the intricacies of the law to protect your estate can be daunting at first but we are here to help you. Our team of experts will guide you in exploring strategies that are beyond the coverage of this article.

While it’s natural to want to support your grandchildren, ensuring that your wishes are respected is equally important. Consult one of our lawyers to preserve your legacy and provide for your family in the way you intend.

New Defamation Laws in NSW: A Landmark Shift for Online Speech

New Defamation Laws in NSW: A Landmark Shift for Online Speech

By Litigation

Australia’s defamation laws have been significantly reformed to adapt to the digital age, with New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) becoming the first jurisdictions to implement these changes, effective from 1 July 2024. These reforms, introduced in NSW through the Defamation Amendment Act 2023  [‘Defamation Act’] are designed to better balance freedom of speech with the protection of reputation in an increasingly online world. This article explains the key aspects of these legislative changes in NSW, their implications, and how they mark a significant shift from previous defamation laws.

If you think you have been defamed or charged with defamation, consult with our experienced criminal lawyers today.

Australian Defamation Law and the Need for Reform

Defamation law in Australia has historically aimed to protect individuals from false and harmful statements. However, the rise of digital platforms and social media has complicated the application of these laws, leading to challenges in balancing reputation protection with free expression. The High Court’s decisions in Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller [2021] and Google LLC v Defteros [2022] highlight the difficulties in determining the liability of digital intermediaries, including social media platforms and forum administrators, for third-party content (content posted by others).

The Voller case was particularly impactful, where the High Court held that media companies, as forum administrators, were liable as publishers of defamatory comments posted by third parties on their social media pages. This ruling underscored the need for clear legislative guidance on the responsibilities and liabilities of digital intermediaries in the digital age.

Key Reforms in the New Defamation Legislation

The new legislation introduces several significant reforms, focusing on the liability of digital intermediaries and the introduction of new defences and exemptions. These changes represent a substantial shift from the previous legal framework.

Innocent Dissemination Defence for Digital Intermediaries

A pivotal reform is the introduction of the innocent dissemination defence under section 31A of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) and section 139BA of the Civil Wrongs Act 2002 (ACT). In NSW,this defence allows digital intermediaries—such as social media platforms, review websites, and forum administrators—to avoid liability for defamatory content posted by third parties, provided they have an ‘accessible complaints mechanism’ (NSW), such as having an email address or a webpage where a complaint can be sent or inputted, respectively. However, the defence requires intermediaries to take ‘access prevention steps’ that remove or block the content within seven days of receiving a complaint.

This new defence is a direct response to the Voller decision and shifts the focus from automatic liability to a more nuanced approach that recognises the intermediary’s role as a facilitator rather than a creator of content. It also extends protections to ordinary individuals, such as parents or community members who administer online forums, offering them a way to avoid liability if they act promptly upon receiving complaints.

Exemptions for Conduit, Caching, and Storage Services and Search Engines

Additionally, the legislation introduces exemptions from defamation liability for certain types of digital intermediaries. This means companies that provide internet services, store data, or operate search engines are now protected from being sued for defamation over content they didn’t create or actively manage. For example, if someone posts defamatory content on social media, and that content is merely stored or passed through these intermediaries, the intermediaries won’t be held legally responsible just because they hosted or transmitted the content.

In contrast, under older laws, these intermediaries could be dragged into defamation litigation even if they had no direct role in creating or controlling the content. This put an unfair burden on them. The new exemptions change that by recognising their passive role, meaning they can’t be sued just for being the “middlemen” in the content’s transmission. This approach aligns Australian law with international standards, especially those in the United Kingdom, where similar protections are already in place.

Mandatory Offer to Make Amends and Access Prevention Steps

The reforms update the offer to make amends scheme, allowing digital publishers to include “access prevention steps”—such as removing or blocking defamatory content—as part of their amends. This change provides a practical solution for swiftly addressing online defamation, reducing the need for prolonged litigation and offering a clear path for resolution.

New Powers for Courts to Order Access Prevention

Courts can now compel non-party digital intermediaries to remove or block access to defamatory content, especially when the original publisher can’t or won’t do so, or when the content spreads beyond its original platform. This power enhances the protection of defamation victims by enabling swift and effective removal of harmful material.

Identification of Anonymous Posters

Addressing the challenge of anonymity in online defamation, the new section 23A of the Defamation Act specifies factors courts must consider when ordering digital intermediaries to disclose the identities of anonymous posters. This includes considering privacy, safety, and public interest, ensuring a balanced approach that protects individual rights while enabling plaintiffs to pursue defamation claims.

Expansion of Electronic Service of Notices

The reforms also modernise the process for serving notices under the Defamation Act, expanding the methods to include email, messaging services, and other electronic communication. This change reflects the realities of modern communication and makes it easier for parties to comply with legal requirements.

Implications

The 2024 reforms represent a significant advancement in Australian defamation law, particularly in how they address the complexities of the digital age. Compared to older laws, these changes provide several key benefits:

Enhanced Protections for Digital Intermediaries

The introduction of the innocent dissemination defence and the statutory exemptions for certain digital services provide much-needed clarity and protection for digital intermediaries. This represents a major shift from previous laws, which often left intermediaries vulnerable to liability for content they did not create or control. The new laws encourage responsible content management without imposing undue burdens on intermediaries.

Better Balance Between Reputation and Free Speech

The legislation strikes a more appropriate balance between protecting reputations and safeguarding free speech. By focusing on serious harm, public interest, and providing practical remedies like access prevention steps, the reforms ensure that defamation law remains effective without stifling public discourse.

Streamlined Legal Processes

The reforms introduce measures that make the legal process more efficient, such as clear defences, the ability to issue take-down orders, and expanded electronic service methods. These changes are particularly important in the fast-paced digital environment, where delays can exacerbate the harm caused by defamatory content.

Alignment with International Standards

By adopting defences and exemptions similar to those in other jurisdictions, particularly the UK, the reforms align Australian defamation law with international standards. This not only provides legal consistency but also supports the growth and innovation of digital platforms in Australia.

Conclusion

The 2024 defamation law reforms in NSW and the ACT mark a significant step forward, addressing the challenges of the digital age and modernising the legal framework to better protect both reputation and free speech. These changes, which include new defences and exemptions for digital intermediaries, empower courts to more effectively manage defamation cases in the online world while providing individuals with clearer, more practical remedies. As the first jurisdictions in Australia to adopt these reforms, NSW and the ACT are leading the way in creating a legal environment that reflects the realities of modern communication.

If you have questions or concerns about defamation laws, if you’re facing a defamation action, or if you think you’re a victim of defamation, don’t hesitate to contact our team of expert lawyers today.